![]() |
|
|||||||
| RDM General Implementation Discussion General Discussion and questions relating to implementing RDM in a product. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#3 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 5
|
This is great, many thanks!
I wonder if you could forward my question to the people working on the DMXcat, or bring this thread to their attention for a direct reply from them? If the DMXcat supports the function as currently defined in E1.20, I will proceed with coding immediately. Otherwise, this will (once again) be on hold until whenever a common and readily available controller will talk to my devices as needed. Way back at the beginning of RDM, I coded a lot of stuff with subdevices and E1.37 PIDs, not realizing customers would be buying controllers that supported neither. This swamped our support channels with complaints we couldn't readily solve, a situation that even today is a significant (and annoying) resource consumer. But at least now we can tell them to get a DMXcat and all will be good. Thanks! Jim |
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Usage of PARAMETER_DESCRIPTION for manufacturer-specific PIDs | R.Schladör | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 9 | September 26th, 2018 12:04 PM |
| PARAMETER_DESCRIPTION data type semantics | tim_ecue | RDM Interpretation Questions | 4 | October 14th, 2009 10:47 AM |