E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums  

Go Back   E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums > RDM Developer Forums > RDM General Implementation Discussion
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

RDM General Implementation Discussion General Discussion and questions relating to implementing RDM in a product.

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old March 3rd, 2012   #8
sblair
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 441
Send a message via AIM to sblair Send a message via MSN to sblair
Default

It's been on the list. What will happen is we will likely add a new PID to one of the E1.37 docs and then just deprecate the original one. We really can't do much in changing the existing one at all as it would break existing usage. Best thing to do is create a new one and deprecate the old.
__________________
Scott M. Blair
RDM Protocol Forums Admin
sblair is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Usage of PARAMETER_DESCRIPTION for manufacturer-specific PIDs R.Schladör RDM General Implementation Discussion 9 September 26th, 2018 12:04 PM
Refreshing "parameter_description" ? theguenni RDM General Implementation Discussion 0 February 29th, 2012 02:36 PM
Refreshing of paramters need Queued Messages? berntd RDM General Implementation Discussion 33 May 25th, 2010 02:09 PM
PARAMETER_DESCRIPTION data type semantics tim_ecue RDM Interpretation Questions 4 October 14th, 2009 10:47 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.