Correctly handling ACK_OVERFLOW

[nomis52]

Originally Posted by prwatE120

Simon

It seems preferable that if the initial GET had a payload (and thus the PDL != 0), this should be repeated in all subsequent GETs until the responder stops replying with the ACK_OVERFLOW.

This needs to be documented in the next erratta.

Peter

Thanks, that's what I expected. Is there a bug list for open issues where these things are tracked or do people just remember to bring them up at the next meeting?