E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums  

Go Back   E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums > RDM Developer Forums > RDM Interpretation Questions
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

RDM Interpretation Questions Discussion and questions relating to interpreting and understanding the E1.20 RDM Standard.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old March 29th, 2010   #1
hamish
Member
 
hamish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Dartmoor, Devon, England
Posts: 56
Send a message via Skype™ to hamish
Default Multifarious consideration

Quote:
A well designed responder will implement SELF_TEST_DESCRIPTION.
Hi Eric.

Yes, while I agree that's true, would it not also be true to say that a well designed standard would foresee this, as it does (to some extent) with required PIDs?
I have here, a responder that complies fully with the standard yet does little to enhance it's reputation. My aim is to present the controller EU with a good experience without making excuses for compliant responders, which is the situation I find myself in. Obviously, in the described situation, the controller will invoke the poke & hope modus operandi.

We're in danger of accepting more holes in the standard than a conventional tea bag.

I concur with Mike and would favour mending the standard.

Time to get back to work....
hamish is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ASN.1 description of RDM sjackman RDM General Implementation Discussion 2 September 19th, 2006 10:20 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.