|
|
|||||||
| RDM Interpretation Questions Discussion and questions relating to interpreting and understanding the E1.20 RDM Standard. |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
January 19th, 2007
|
#1 |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 441
  |
That example is incorrect. The correct value for STATUS_ERROR is 0x04. The correct value for SC_SUB_MESSAGE is 0x01.
With the STATUS_ERROR of 0x04 and SC_SUB_MESSAGE, the correct Checksum would be: High Byte=0x06, Low Byte=0x69.
__________________
Scott M. Blair  RDM Protocol Forums Admin Last edited by sblair; January 19th, 2007 at 08:08 PM. |
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| COMMS_STATUS Error reporting | prwatE120 | RDM Interpretation Questions | 0 | January 20th, 2007 07:07 AM |
| ACK_TIMER Example Error | prwatE120 | RDM Interpretation Questions | 1 | December 26th, 2006 03:46 PM |
| Checksum curiosa | sjackman | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 3 | October 3rd, 2006 06:24 AM |
| Discovery Checksum Problem Analysis | nic123 | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 3 | September 24th, 2006 10:25 PM |
| Error counters | Nigel Worsley | RDM Interpretation Questions | 1 | July 3rd, 2006 03:42 PM |
Hybrid Mode
