![]() |
|
|||||||
| RDM General Implementation Discussion General Discussion and questions relating to implementing RDM in a product. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#2 |
|
Task Group Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 390
|
I agree that such a list would be valuable, but making sure it's kept up to date and accurate would be a challenge.
I think about my own experience with the IEEE Registration Authority for MAC addresses. Every place I've worked the listing is somewhat out of date because the person who's the official contact left or changed jobs and no one can find the credentials to update the listing (if anyone even remembers it needs to be changed). From my perspective, as part of building the fixture library profile for a specific fixture, you're going to have to download the documentation for that fixture anyway. As long as the RDM Model ID is included in the documentation, it simply becomes another piece of information you have to take from the docs and include in your library. (I'm speaking solely for myself and my own opinions here, this in no way represents the views of ESTA, the CPWG, the RDM TG) |
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Product Marking for RDM Compliance | pkirkup | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 1 | December 1st, 2009 09:33 AM |
| Is there a minimum required PID list for sub-devices? | p_richart | RDM Interpretation Questions | 4 | November 7th, 2008 01:04 PM |
| Master Fader accross Rdm implementation Question | berntd | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 1 | May 9th, 2008 12:12 AM |