![]() |
|
|||||||
| RDM General Implementation Discussion General Discussion and questions relating to implementing RDM in a product. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Task Group Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 26
|
A fundamental assumption made above is that the transmission medium acts as a wire-and, such that the receiver sees a one if both transmitters transmit a one, and sees a zero otherwise. DMX uses a differential transmission medium, and so a one is transmitted as
Code:
D+ = V+ D- = V- Code:
D+ = V- D- = V+ Code:
D+ = V- of B D- = V- of A Code:
|D+ - D-| < 0.2 V Cheers, Shaun Jackman Pathway Connectivity |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: London
Posts: 13
|
You are forgetting two things:
The SN75176 is a very old device, and more modern transceivers usually guarantee that a 0V input will give a high output. The MAX485 datasheet says: "The receiver input has a fail-safe feature that guarantees a logic-high output if the input is open circuit." Also, the controller's terminating network is required to put a slight bias on the line. Either of these things would ensure that a collision by drivers of exactly equal strength would result in a one being received. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Incremental Discovery | prwatE120 | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 1 | September 29th, 2021 03:18 PM |
| Discovery Response Preamble | prwatE120 | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 0 | January 20th, 2007 12:22 AM |
| Table 6-6 Checksum Example Error | prwatE120 | RDM Interpretation Questions | 1 | January 19th, 2007 06:49 PM |
| Checksum curiosa | sjackman | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 3 | October 3rd, 2006 06:24 AM |