E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums 3.3V Biasing
 User Name Remember Me? Password
 Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

 RDM Physical Layer/Hardware Discussion Discussion and questions relating to the physical or hardware layer of RDM.

 Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
 November 29th, 2006 #1 William CANO Junior Member   Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 2 3.3V Biasing Hi, I plan t bias in 3.3V ( in spite of 5V). I don't understand how to calculate the right valus for the controler resistors. Do you have any idea ? William
 November 30th, 2006 #2 Nigel Worsley Junior Member   Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: London Posts: 13 Change Rt1 to 150R and R1, R2 to 390R. This gives almost exactly the same bias voltage, and is reasonably close to the 120R impedance requirement ( 126R ). Using difficult to obtain ( in small quantities ) values could provide a slightly closer match, but there is little point as the cable impedance will probably vary by far more than this anyway.
 November 30th, 2006 #3 William CANO Junior Member   Join Date: Nov 2006 Posts: 2 Many Thanks Nigel, Could you explain how to calculate ? Kind regards William
 December 5th, 2006 #4 Nigel Worsley Junior Member   Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: London Posts: 13 Th equations are: Vbias = Vcc * 1 / ( 1 / Rt1 + 1 / Rt2 ) / ( 1 / ( 1 / Rt1 + 1 / Rt2 ) + R1 + R2 ) Rterm = 1 / ( 1 / Rt1 + 1 / ( R1 + R2 ) ) The specification requires Vbias to be greater than 245mV and Rterm to be 120R +/- 10% Calculation isn't all that simple, successive approximation with the aid of a apreadsheet is probably the easiest way. If you settle on 250mV bias voltage, then the values work out as: R1 and R2 = 396R Rt1 = 141.4R Vbias = 249.98mV Rterm = 119.98 Neither of these are standard resistor values, the nearest are 397R and 142R. However, these are part of the E192 series, which means that they are often impossible to obtain in small ( less than ten thousand ) quantities. The nearest readily available values are 390R and 150R, the values I originally suggested. This gives 259.8 mV and 125.8R which is close enough. If you want a better impedance match, then reduce R1 and R2 to 300R, which will give an exact match but increases the bias voltage to 330mV. This isn't likely to be high enough to cause a problem, but neither will the 125.8R impedance. Note that the power dissipation in Rt1 is likely to be about 170mW, this will be too much for most surface mount resistors.

 Bookmarks

 Thread Tools Search this Thread Search this Thread: Advanced Search Display Modes Linear Mode

 Posting Rules You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts BB code is On Smilies are On [IMG] code is On HTML code is Off Forum Rules
 Forum Jump User Control Panel Private Messages Subscriptions Who's Online Search Forums Forums Home RDM Developer Forums     RDM General Implementation Discussion     RDM Interpretation Questions     RDM Physical Layer/Hardware Discussion     RDM Timing Discussion     RDMnet (E1.33) General Discussion     E1.31/sACN General Discussion RDM User Forums     RDM User Discussion     DMX512 Discussion     RDM Marketplace Discussion

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post berntd RDM Physical Layer/Hardware Discussion 7 April 9th, 2009 05:32 PM Andy Macdonald RDM Physical Layer/Hardware Discussion 1 October 26th, 2006 11:02 AM

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:24 PM.

 Contact Us - RDM Protocol Forums - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.