|
RDM Interpretation Questions Discussion and questions relating to interpreting and understanding the E1.20 RDM Standard. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
July 28th, 2013 | #1 |
Task Group Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: San Franciscio
Posts: 57
|
Another BLOCK_ADDRESS question
I'm busy adding responder tests for the E1.37-1 PIDs. I'm having trouble deciding what I should expect for GET DMX_BLOCK_ADDRESS in the following situation:
i) the DMX_BLOCK_ADDRESS pid is declared as supported ii) DEVICE_INFO has no sub devices declared. Clearly the sub-device footprint must be 0, but what should the base DMX address be? I would have expected 0xffff but it's not called out in the standard. Yes, it's a weird corner case, but that's what the tests are for... Simon |
Bookmarks |
|
|