![]() |
|
RDM Interpretation Questions Discussion and questions relating to interpreting and understanding the E1.20 RDM Standard. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Posts: 8
|
![]()
Hi all,
I have a (possibly theoretical) question: If the message length, which indicates the slot of the checksum, is greater than the PDL plus 24 bytes, could the packet contain gaps? Using E1.20 - 6.2.3 as an example: Code:
0 | StartCode | SC_RDM 1 | SubStartCode | SC_SUB_MESSAGE 2 | MessageLength | 26 //Not 25 as given in the example ... 21-22 | PID | STATUS_MESSAGES 23 | Parameter Data Length (PDL) | 1 24 | Parameter Data | STATUS_ERROR 25 | <gap> | 0xff //Example value 26 | Checksum High | Checksum also contains the <gap> value 27 | Checksum Low | Should such a packet be processed if the checksum is still correct? Thanks! |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Responder Packet Timing issue | berntd | RDM Timing Discussion | 10 | May 27th, 2015 12:40 AM |
3.2.1 Responder Packet Timings | prwatE120 | RDM Timing Discussion | 6 | May 23rd, 2009 08:32 AM |
Packet Captures? | jhuntington | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 0 | March 4th, 2007 07:19 PM |