E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums  

Go Back   E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums > RDM Developer Forums > RDM General Implementation Discussion

RDM General Implementation Discussion General Discussion and questions relating to implementing RDM in a product.

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old September 5th, 2010   #1
nomis52
Task Group Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: San Franciscio
Posts: 57
Default Correctly handling ACK_OVERFLOW

What's the correct behavior for this? The standard says "the controller should continue to send get commands for the same PID" but mentions nothing about what the PD field should contain.

Does that mean the PD and PDL fields should remain identical to the first message or can I send no data for the subsequent get commands?

For the two examples in the spec (proxied devices and supported parameters) it doesn't matter because the PDL is always 0 but I can imagine a case where the PD contained data specific to the GET request.

Thanks,

Simon
nomis52 is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ACK_TIMER Handling ericthegeek RDM General Implementation Discussion 8 January 20th, 2011 08:15 PM
Command Class / Parameter ID mismatch handling dangeross RDM Interpretation Questions 2 April 16th, 2009 01:39 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.