|
RDM Interpretation Questions Discussion and questions relating to interpreting and understanding the E1.20 RDM Standard. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
June 14th, 2012 | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2
|
Interpretation of NR_BUFFER_FULL
Hi all,
imagine the following situation: The message queue of an RDM responder is full. A Set request arrives. Saving needs too long to be answered with ACK. Therefore the answer is NACK with reason NR_BUFFER_FULL. What behavior would you expect from the RDM responder? 1. The value is saved but no message written to the queue. Because: If the RDM controller does not support QUEUED_MESSAGE it is still be able to configure the RDM responder also if the message queue is full. The successful saving can be checked using the corresponding Get request. 2. The value is not changed Because: The responder reported NACK, which is defined as "the responder is ... unable to process the specified SET command" 3. Any other behavior ??? Best regards Thomas |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Interpretation of ACK_TIMER | eldoMS | RDM Interpretation Questions | 4 | August 21st, 2011 03:39 AM |
Welcome to the RDM Interpretation Discussion Forum | sblair | RDM Interpretation Questions | 0 | May 31st, 2006 10:47 PM |