|
RDM General Implementation Discussion General Discussion and questions relating to implementing RDM in a product. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
September 5th, 2010 | #1 |
Task Group Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: San Franciscio
Posts: 57
|
Correctly handling ACK_OVERFLOW
What's the correct behavior for this? The standard says "the controller should continue to send get commands for the same PID" but mentions nothing about what the PD field should contain.
Does that mean the PD and PDL fields should remain identical to the first message or can I send no data for the subsequent get commands? For the two examples in the spec (proxied devices and supported parameters) it doesn't matter because the PDL is always 0 but I can imagine a case where the PD contained data specific to the GET request. Thanks, Simon |
Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ACK_TIMER Handling | ericthegeek | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 8 | January 20th, 2011 08:15 PM |
Command Class / Parameter ID mismatch handling | dangeross | RDM Interpretation Questions | 2 | April 16th, 2009 01:39 PM |