|
RDM Interpretation Questions Discussion and questions relating to interpreting and understanding the E1.20 RDM Standard. |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
April 2nd, 2014 | #1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 8
|
MINIMUM_LEVEL
Hi,
looking at this PID description, I was'nt able to fully understand how a responder should behave in response to MINIMUM_LEVE settings: if "On Below Minimum" = 1, what is dimmer supposed to do if DMX512 input is 0? It has to stay to minimum or turn off? Thanks Francesco |
April 2nd, 2014 | #2 |
Task Group Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 379
|
Hopefully this graphic will help explain the behavior.
Edit: The forum software rescaled the image so it's a bit hard to read. Here's the text: The graphic on the left: One Below Minimum=1 A.K.A "Preheat" Light output never goes below the minimum level. The graphic on the right: One Below Minimum=0 No light output until a minimum level is reached. Typical behavior for dimmable fluorescents Last edited by ericthegeek; April 2nd, 2014 at 11:33 AM. |
April 2nd, 2014 | #3 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 8
|
Quote:
thanks for the support. So, in the "Preheat" configuration, output never goes OFF even if DMX512 is 0? To me it sounds quite strange but, if this is the standard requirement, i will follow it!!! |
|
April 2nd, 2014 | #4 | |
Task Group Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 379
|
Quote:
There's no requirement that you offer a preheat function. If your product supports preheat, you can use this PID to control and report it, but if you don't want to offer this feature, you don't have to. It's entirely your choice. It depends on the kind of product you are building, and the needs of your customers. Last edited by ericthegeek; April 2nd, 2014 at 01:00 PM. |
|
August 1st, 2014 | #5 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 24
|
Mostly, MINIMUM_LEVEL will go together with MAXIMUM_LEVEL. When setting both, the usable fader travel will be narrowed (between the yellow dotted lines).
There is a simple way to widen the fader range. Simply calculate OUTLEVEL = INLEVEL*(MAX_LEVEL-MIN_LEVEL) + MIN_LEVEL and you can make use of the full fader range. We have added a parameter (flag) to do so and this would be a nice complement for the "ON_BELOW_ZERO" Flag. Maybe this option could be added to the MIN_LEVEL PID in future versions. Last edited by este_; August 4th, 2014 at 11:14 AM. Reason: typos |
January 20th, 2021 | #6 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Treviso, Italy
Posts: 13
|
Hello,
here's a question about Split levels in Minimum level PID. If I correctly understand about Increasing and Decreasing definitions, I infer that Increasing minimum Level has to be set higher than Decreasing one..... Is my interpretation correct? If not, could you explain better this topic? Thank you |
January 21st, 2021 | #7 |
Task Group Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 379
|
From the protocol perspective, it doesn't matter. You can put any value in either field.
But in most cases those fields are used to provide hysteresis for applications and lamp types that need it. In those cases, yes, you'd expect the "increasing" value to be greater than than the "decreasing" value. |
January 21st, 2021 | #8 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Treviso, Italy
Posts: 13
|
Quote:
(INLEVEL*(MAX_LEVEL-MIN_LEVEL))/MAX_DMX_LEVEL + MIN_LEVEL |
|
January 21st, 2021 | #9 |
Task Group Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 379
|
There's not one "correct" equation. Dimmer curves (the DMX to output level mapping) is the subject of endless debate. este_'s equation might work for some users. But, if the user wants levels to match between fixtures with and without preheat, then it's not the best choice.
From the standard's perspective, any output mapping is acceptable. You can also expose multiple dimmer curves via RDM to give flexibility. |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|