E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums  

Go Back   E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums > RDM Developer Forums > RDM Interpretation Questions

RDM Interpretation Questions Discussion and questions relating to interpreting and understanding the E1.20 RDM Standard.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old April 2nd, 2014   #1
docsale
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 8
Default MINIMUM_LEVEL

Hi,

looking at this PID description, I was'nt able to fully understand how a responder should behave in response to MINIMUM_LEVE settings: if "On Below Minimum" = 1, what is dimmer supposed to do if DMX512 input is 0? It has to stay to minimum or turn off?

Thanks

Francesco
docsale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 2nd, 2014   #2
ericthegeek
Task Group Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 379
Default

Hopefully this graphic will help explain the behavior.


Edit:
The forum software rescaled the image so it's a bit hard to read. Here's the text:

The graphic on the left:
One Below Minimum=1 A.K.A "Preheat"
Light output never goes below the minimum level.


The graphic on the right:
One Below Minimum=0
No light output until a minimum level is reached.
Typical behavior for dimmable fluorescents
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Min_Level.jpg (22.0 KB, 14262 views)

Last edited by ericthegeek; April 2nd, 2014 at 11:33 AM.
ericthegeek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 2nd, 2014   #3
docsale
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 8
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ericthegeek View Post
Hopefully this graphic will help explain the behavior.


Edit:
The forum software rescaled the image so it's a bit hard to read. Here's the text:

The graphic on the left:
One Below Minimum=1 A.K.A "Preheat"
Light output never goes below the minimum level.


The graphic on the right:
One Below Minimum=0
No light output until a minimum level is reached.
Typical behavior for dimmable fluorescents
Hi,

thanks for the support. So, in the "Preheat" configuration, output never goes OFF even if DMX512 is 0? To me it sounds quite strange but, if this is the standard requirement, i will follow it!!!
docsale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 2nd, 2014   #4
ericthegeek
Task Group Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 379
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by docsale View Post
thanks for the support. So, in the "Preheat" configuration, output never goes OFF even if DMX512 is 0? To me it sounds quite strange but, if this is the standard requirement, i will follow it!!!
Preheat is commonly used with incandescent lamps. By keeping the filament glowing at a very low level you can get much faster response when you want a fast turn-on. It's a major energy waster so not used as often as it was in the past, but still a useful feature. In shows with lots of flashing, it can also improve lamp life.


There's no requirement that you offer a preheat function. If your product supports preheat, you can use this PID to control and report it, but if you don't want to offer this feature, you don't have to. It's entirely your choice. It depends on the kind of product you are building, and the needs of your customers.

Last edited by ericthegeek; April 2nd, 2014 at 01:00 PM.
ericthegeek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 1st, 2014   #5
este_
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 24
Default

Mostly, MINIMUM_LEVEL will go together with MAXIMUM_LEVEL. When setting both, the usable fader travel will be narrowed (between the yellow dotted lines).

Name:  Min_Level 2.jpg
Views: 18916
Size:  6.6 KB

There is a simple way to widen the fader range. Simply calculate OUTLEVEL = INLEVEL*(MAX_LEVEL-MIN_LEVEL) + MIN_LEVEL and you can make use of the full fader range. We have added a parameter (flag) to do so and this would be a nice complement for the "ON_BELOW_ZERO" Flag. Maybe this option could be added to the MIN_LEVEL PID in future versions.

Last edited by este_; August 4th, 2014 at 11:14 AM. Reason: typos
este_ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 20th, 2021   #6
zano_villa
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Treviso, Italy
Posts: 13
Default

Hello,

here's a question about Split levels in Minimum level PID.
If I correctly understand about Increasing and Decreasing definitions, I infer that Increasing minimum Level has to be set higher than Decreasing one.....
Is my interpretation correct?
If not, could you explain better this topic?
Thank you
zano_villa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 21st, 2021   #7
ericthegeek
Task Group Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 379
Default

From the protocol perspective, it doesn't matter. You can put any value in either field.

But in most cases those fields are used to provide hysteresis for applications and lamp types that need it. In those cases, yes, you'd expect the "increasing" value to be greater than than the "decreasing" value.
ericthegeek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 21st, 2021   #8
zano_villa
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Treviso, Italy
Posts: 13
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by este_ View Post
Mostly, MINIMUM_LEVEL will go together with MAXIMUM_LEVEL. When setting both, the usable fader travel will be narrowed (between the yellow dotted lines).

Attachment 43

There is a simple way to widen the fader range. Simply calculate OUTLEVEL = INLEVEL*(MAX_LEVEL-MIN_LEVEL) + MIN_LEVEL and you can make use of the full fader range. We have added a parameter (flag) to do so and this would be a nice complement for the "ON_BELOW_ZERO" Flag. Maybe this option could be added to the MIN_LEVEL PID in future versions.

(INLEVEL*(MAX_LEVEL-MIN_LEVEL))/MAX_DMX_LEVEL + MIN_LEVEL
zano_villa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old January 21st, 2021   #9
ericthegeek
Task Group Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 379
Default

There's not one "correct" equation. Dimmer curves (the DMX to output level mapping) is the subject of endless debate. este_'s equation might work for some users. But, if the user wants levels to match between fixtures with and without preheat, then it's not the best choice.

From the standard's perspective, any output mapping is acceptable. You can also expose multiple dimmer curves via RDM to give flexibility.
ericthegeek is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:48 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.