![]() |
|
RDM Interpretation Questions Discussion and questions relating to interpreting and understanding the E1.20 RDM Standard. |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 102
|
![]()
Hello,
Should devices generate queued mesages if they act on a broadcast command instead of the same direct address command? Regards Bernt |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Administrator
|
![]()
Are you talking about a GET or SET Broadcast command?
Section 6.2.10.1 spells out when a device should respond or not. This is to obviously prevent collisions. By virtue of this table though, devices are not required to Queue a message in response to a broadcast GET or SET Command. Queueing a message up shouldn't break anything though and I could see how it might be useful in specific implementations. However, it is not something you should expect as an implementation in other devices. If you send a Broadcast SET command and there is an issue of some type, then it would be reasonable to Queue up whatever message is appropriate to alert the controller that the value did not persist.
__________________
Scott M. Blair ![]() RDM Protocol Forums Admin |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ACT_TIMER to Set messages | nic123 | RDM Interpretation Questions | 3 | April 18th, 2014 12:01 PM |
ACK_TIMER Handling | ericthegeek | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 8 | January 20th, 2011 08:15 PM |
get queued messages as a ping? | sondericker | RDM Interpretation Questions | 2 | January 20th, 2007 09:11 PM |
ACK_TIMER Example Error | prwatE120 | RDM Interpretation Questions | 1 | December 26th, 2006 03:46 PM |
Request in the middle of ACK_TIMER | endoftheworld | RDM Interpretation Questions | 1 | July 13th, 2006 10:53 PM |