![]() |
|
|||||||
| RDM Interpretation Questions Discussion and questions relating to interpreting and understanding the E1.20 RDM Standard. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Administrator
|
I believe that the correct intent is to collect all the queued messages first and then after that you'll receive any status messages. If you determine it is more important to return a status message first, I don't see anything that prevents you from doing that. They key thing is that you wouldn't change the Message Count since that is only counting queued messages not including status messages.
__________________
Scott M. Blair ![]() RDM Protocol Forums Admin |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Response to GET:QUEUED MESSAGE when NACKing query | prwatE120 | RDM Interpretation Questions | 3 | February 24th, 2016 05:33 PM |
| What NACK to use for messages sent to Subdevices ? | prwatE120 | RDM Interpretation Questions | 0 | February 24th, 2016 05:08 PM |
| Status Message Markers | hamish | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 4 | December 9th, 2010 11:12 PM |
| Personality & Subdevices | kocurr | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 1 | July 8th, 2008 09:30 PM |
| ENTTEC RDM controller (subdevices) | nic123 | RDM Marketplace Discussion | 3 | October 24th, 2007 12:03 AM |