![]() |
|
|||||||
| RDM Interpretation Questions Discussion and questions relating to interpreting and understanding the E1.20 RDM Standard. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Administrator
|
Quote:
There's two issues here. If the Footprint is zero then that means the Start Address PID is probably not a supported PID. The language in the current version of RDM creates some confusion here because the Start Address PID isn't one that is supposed to be sent in a SUPPORTED_PARAMETERS but it is also allowed not required if it doesn't have a footprint. The other scenario is that the general view is that a device shouldn't ACK something unless the action has been completed. If you send a SET and it didn't actually do the set then that should be a NACK. If it allows you to actually change the address for use with other personalities that do have a non-zero footprint, then I agree that would be an ACK.
__________________
Scott M. Blair ![]() RDM Protocol Forums Admin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: London
Posts: 11
|
I'm just going to echo part of my earlier post:
Quote:
Devil's advocate, should it ACK a SET of 0xFFFF? |
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How to handle DMX Footprint overrun | RobbG | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 3 | May 8th, 2017 08:42 AM |
| change parameter setting | ilek79 | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 4 | January 12th, 2017 09:15 PM |
| Second configurable DMX address | stefkuhb | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 5 | October 22nd, 2014 08:17 AM |
| DMX Addressing when Footprint is Zero | Mark_C | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 8 | January 17th, 2010 10:47 AM |
| Sub-device response to SET/GET DMX512 start address | p_richart | RDM Interpretation Questions | 2 | September 29th, 2006 09:27 AM |