![]() |
|
|||||||
| RDM Interpretation Questions Discussion and questions relating to interpreting and understanding the E1.20 RDM Standard. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Task Group Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 390
|
I recommend writing the EEPROM in the lazy loop to avoid this problem rather than blocking your RDM routine for the entire time that it takes to complete the EEPROM write.
These older posts have more details: http://www.rdmprotocol.org/forums/sh...61&postcount=6 http://www.rdmprotocol.org/forums/sh...12&postcount=2 You don't always have 2ms to process a SET. You can take but to 2ms to respond to a unicast request, but that doesn't apply to broadcast/vendorcast requests. The controller can broadcast a SET command, and then issue a GET for the same data 176 microseconds later. If you're blocked handling the broadcast set, you'll miss the next request. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| QUEUED_MESSAGE - must controllers support this? | berntd | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 4 | December 11th, 2024 08:53 AM |
| QUEUED_MESSAGE & Status Types | pkleissler | RDM Interpretation Questions | 13 | August 1st, 2019 03:23 AM |
| Please clarify: QUEUED_MESSAGE (10.3 Collection of Queued and Status Messages) | berntd | RDM Interpretation Questions | 1 | September 27th, 2013 06:33 PM |
| QUEUED_MESSAGE - ? | berntd | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 9 | November 24th, 2009 08:48 AM |