E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums  

Go Back   E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums > RDM Developer Forums > RDM Interpretation Questions

RDM Interpretation Questions Discussion and questions relating to interpreting and understanding the E1.20 RDM Standard.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old April 14th, 2014   #1
ericthegeek
Task Group Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 390
Default

We run into this question with all of the PIDs that are "conditionally required" (DMX_START_ADDRESS, PARAMETER_DESCRIPTION, etc.). You can make a legitimate argument both ways.

In the real world, declaring extra PIDs in the list of supported parameters is unlikely to break any RDM Controllers. Controllers have to assume that new PIDs will be added in the future, so the extra information should just be ignored.

Thus I would suggest including the _DESCRIPTION PIDs in the list of supported parameters.
ericthegeek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old April 14th, 2014   #2
RenZO
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 2
Default

Thank you ericthegeek, that makes sense
I would say it's the same for DMX_PERSONALITY_DESCRIPTION, which is not "conditionally required" in Table A-3 but should be, and I often see it in supported parameters.
RenZO is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sensor Defintion/Support Parameters gthaliath RDM General Implementation Discussion 28 July 18th, 2026 09:33 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.