|
|
|||||||
| RDM Interpretation Questions Discussion and questions relating to interpreting and understanding the E1.20 RDM Standard. |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
February 25th, 2014
|
#1 |
|
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 441
  |
You are not required to support the SET just because you support a GET. This is exactly what the NR_UNSUPPORTED_CC was created for.
__________________
Scott M. Blair  RDM Protocol Forums Admin |
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ACT_TIMER to Set messages | nic123 | RDM Interpretation Questions | 3 | April 18th, 2014 12:01 PM |
| DMX_BLOCK_ADDRESS (Set) | hamish | RDM Interpretation Questions | 7 | June 26th, 2013 02:53 AM |
| Sub-device response to SET/GET DMX512 start address | p_richart | RDM Interpretation Questions | 2 | September 29th, 2006 09:27 AM |
Hybrid Mode
