|
|
|||||||
| RDM General Implementation Discussion General Discussion and questions relating to implementing RDM in a product. |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
February 14th, 2014
|
#1 |
|
Task Group Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 390
|
The STATUS_MESSAGES data format described in E1.20-2010 section 10.3.2 is enclosed in the general packet format described in section 6.2. That enclosing packet has the responder's UID included.
Status messages (and queued messages) are more of an advanced feature for RDM. They are not required for basic operation. In fact, many simple responders don't implement status messages at all. Rather than focusing on Status Messages right away, you may want to get the rest of your responder working, then go back and add status message support once you have that foundation to build on. |
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| QUEUED_MESSAGE - must controllers support this? | berntd | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 4 | December 11th, 2024 08:53 AM |
| Sensor type and Sensor unit for No of Phases question | berntd | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 1 | October 1st, 2009 10:04 PM |
| Sensor type and Sensor unit for DMX rate question | berntd | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 3 | October 1st, 2009 12:41 AM |
| DMX/RDM support in new SBC | tracyu | RDM Marketplace Discussion | 0 | June 2nd, 2008 05:57 PM |
Hybrid Mode
