|
|
|||||||
| RDM Interpretation Questions Discussion and questions relating to interpreting and understanding the E1.20 RDM Standard. |
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
May 1st, 2012
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 7
|
Hey Peter,
Yes the spec says LAMP_HOURS is 32bit, and that's the way I implemented it in Wireshark. But I have a capture file from someone that has a LAMP_HOURS PID with a PDL of 2. The question should probably more be like; when PID and PDL disagree, should I assume spec is always right and mark the packet as broken? |
|
|
|
May 1st, 2012
|
#2 | |
|
Task Group Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 390
|
Quote:
This is a common problem, I've seen many devices that send incorrect PDLs, especially on ACK SET_RESPONSE packets. Such behavior can cause interoperability problems. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PID = SUPPORTED_PARAMTERS / PARAMTER_DESCRIPTION question | berntd | RDM Interpretation Questions | 14 | February 9th, 2015 03:54 PM |
| CAPTURE_PRESET pdl? | berntd | RDM Interpretation Questions | 4 | October 19th, 2009 09:52 PM |
| PDL size and manufacturer specific parameter ID's | jamie | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 5 | July 13th, 2009 12:31 AM |
| Is there a minimum required PID list for sub-devices? | p_richart | RDM Interpretation Questions | 4 | November 7th, 2008 01:04 PM |
Hybrid Mode
