Self test description question - E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums

Gerry · March 31st, 2010

Well I vote for non-contiquous. The way I see it, manufacturers will drop test codes for exactly the reason Eric cited above.

A better way might be to implement a "get test codes" PID in the same way as we now have the E120_SUPPORTED_PARAMETERS. Then the controller can directly get at any test code without hunting for it. Also when the "get test codes" PID is supported the Responder shall support SELF_TEST_DESCRIPTION.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
ASN.1 description of RDM	sjackman	RDM General Implementation Discussion	2	September 19th, 2006 10:20 AM

March 31st, 2010	#19
Gerry Junior Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: UK Posts: 8	Well I vote for non-contiquous. The way I see it, manufacturers will drop test codes for exactly the reason Eric cited above. A better way might be to implement a "get test codes" PID in the same way as we now have the E120_SUPPORTED_PARAMETERS. Then the controller can directly get at any test code without hunting for it. Also when the "get test codes" PID is supported the Responder shall support SELF_TEST_DESCRIPTION.