![]() |
|
|||||||
| RDM Interpretation Questions Discussion and questions relating to interpreting and understanding the E1.20 RDM Standard. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Member
|
Quote:
![]() This is an area of the standard that could definately benefit from a revision. Something like Get PERFORM_SELFTEST, PDL = 1, PD = $FF would return the count of available self tests. Using PD in the range of 1 .. Count(tests) would return the status of the individual tests. Mean while, if anybody can suggest a way out of my little dilemma (with out stopping or starting sef-tests) please comment. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 8
|
Quote:
Does this responder actually expect the controller to initiate the self tests? If the test PD's are documented in the manual, I guess you could build them into your controller, but it sucks and goes totally against the grain of RDM. Personally, I wouldn't lose sleep over this. If a responder manufacturer includes self tests, but chooses not to allow the controller to find them by including SELF_TEST_DESCRIPTION, then I would assume they are not for general use. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Member
|
Gerry
I'm working from the perspective of a generic controller and therefore have to cater for all eventualities. I'd recommend the exercise to anyone who likes a challenge, its like a box of chocolates, you never know what you're going to get till you open it! ![]() Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ASN.1 description of RDM | sjackman | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 2 | September 19th, 2006 10:20 AM |