![]() |
|
|||||||
| RDM Interpretation Questions Discussion and questions relating to interpreting and understanding the E1.20 RDM Standard. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#2 |
|
Administrator
|
My concern would be in adding a mode to a defined message that isn't widely supported. Having a mode that explicitly ignores all commands to strike would often make the product appear broken. Hence, why I don't think there would be very wide support for it.
I'd be curious in understanding their needs with this a bit more. Obviously as you mentioned this could be handled with a manufacturer-specific message and that may be the best option.
__________________
Scott M. Blair ![]() RDM Protocol Forums Admin |
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|