![]() |
|
|||||||
| RDM Interpretation Questions Discussion and questions relating to interpreting and understanding the E1.20 RDM Standard. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#2 |
|
Administrator
|
Patrick,
For Question #1: It is expected that messages sent to a SUB_DEVICE_ALL_CALL for a specific UID respond back to the controller. Since you are communicating to a specific UID, there aren't any collision issues that you would have using an ALL_CALL with other root devices. You'll see in the message templates for the Controller and Response messages that 0xFFFF is included in the Sub-Device field as valid for response messages. For Question #2: For a GET sent to all the SUB_DEVICE_ALL_CALL the answer is a little less clear. There is no defined behavior I can think of that specifies a useful response here. It's kind of a non-sensical request to get from a controller for some devices. Some options you have:
__________________
Scott M. Blair ![]() RDM Protocol Forums Admin |
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| When is a different start code allowed? | berntd | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 6 | September 16th, 2008 03:00 PM |
| Mute Response Question | sondericker | RDM Interpretation Questions | 13 | January 21st, 2007 10:14 AM |
| Discovery Response Preamble | prwatE120 | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 0 | January 20th, 2007 12:22 AM |
| Device Models | Andy Macdonald | RDM Interpretation Questions | 4 | October 17th, 2006 05:57 AM |
| Welcome to the DMX512 Discussion Forum | sblair | DMX512 Discussion | 0 | May 31st, 2006 11:10 PM |