E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums  

Go Back   E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums > RDM Developer Forums > RDM Interpretation Questions
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

RDM Interpretation Questions Discussion and questions relating to interpreting and understanding the E1.20 RDM Standard.

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old February 25th, 2014   #2
sblair
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 441
Send a message via AIM to sblair Send a message via MSN to sblair
Default

You are not required to support the SET just because you support a GET. This is exactly what the NR_UNSUPPORTED_CC was created for.
__________________
Scott M. Blair
RDM Protocol Forums Admin
sblair is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ACT_TIMER to Set messages nic123 RDM Interpretation Questions 3 April 18th, 2014 12:01 PM
DMX_BLOCK_ADDRESS (Set) hamish RDM Interpretation Questions 7 June 26th, 2013 02:53 AM
Sub-device response to SET/GET DMX512 start address p_richart RDM Interpretation Questions 2 September 29th, 2006 09:27 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:54 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.