E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums  

Go Back   E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums > RDM Developer Forums > RDM General Implementation Discussion
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

RDM General Implementation Discussion General Discussion and questions relating to implementing RDM in a product.

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old February 14th, 2014   #16
ericthegeek
Task Group Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 390
Default

The STATUS_MESSAGES data format described in E1.20-2010 section 10.3.2 is enclosed in the general packet format described in section 6.2. That enclosing packet has the responder's UID included.

Status messages (and queued messages) are more of an advanced feature for RDM. They are not required for basic operation. In fact, many simple responders don't implement status messages at all. Rather than focusing on Status Messages right away, you may want to get the rest of your responder working, then go back and add status message support once you have that foundation to build on.
ericthegeek is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
QUEUED_MESSAGE - must controllers support this? berntd RDM General Implementation Discussion 4 December 11th, 2024 08:53 AM
Sensor type and Sensor unit for No of Phases question berntd RDM General Implementation Discussion 1 October 1st, 2009 10:04 PM
Sensor type and Sensor unit for DMX rate question berntd RDM General Implementation Discussion 3 October 1st, 2009 12:41 AM
DMX/RDM support in new SBC tracyu RDM Marketplace Discussion 0 June 2nd, 2008 05:57 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.