![]() |
|
|||||||
| RDM Interpretation Questions Discussion and questions relating to interpreting and understanding the E1.20 RDM Standard. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#6 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Treviso, Italy
Posts: 21
|
Hello,
I need an explanation, please. Point 10.3.1. of the standard seems to state that a receiver must always respond with a STATUS MESSAGE with PDL = 0 when it receives a GET QUEUED MESSAGE with no messages pending (MESSAGE COUNT = 0) But this seems to be an incorrect interpretation. In fact if I don't support GET_STATUS_MESSAGES, then I MUST respond with a STATUS_MESSAGE with PDL of 0x00 (I must respond in this way even if I don't support STATUS MESSAGES PID and this does not imply a STATUS MESSAGES support as it is reported in the text) But If I support GET_STATUS_MESSAGES, then I must respond with a STATUS MESSAGE with STATUS TYPE requested. A STATUS MESSAGE response with PDL = 0 doesn't mean that there are no messages pending, this information simply is supplied by MESSAGE COUNT = 0. Am I right? Thank you |
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| RDM & DMX frames multiplexing | DavidR | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 2 | November 20th, 2010 04:10 AM |
| QUEUED_MESSAGE - ? | berntd | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 9 | November 24th, 2009 08:48 AM |
| capture & playback preset | chris | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 1 | August 4th, 2009 05:45 PM |
| Personality & Subdevices | kocurr | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 1 | July 8th, 2008 09:30 PM |