![]() |
|
|||||||
| RDM Interpretation Questions Discussion and questions relating to interpreting and understanding the E1.20 RDM Standard. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 7
|
Hey all,
while writing the Wireshark dissector I ran into a RDM packet that I don't know how to handle. It has a PID of 0x0401 (LAMP_HOURS) and a PDL of 2. But the spec (just bought the new one to verify) says that LAMP_HOURS should be a 32bit value. So, or the PID is wrong, or the PDL is wrong. How should one deal with situations where PID and PDL disagree ? - Erwin |
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| PID = SUPPORTED_PARAMTERS / PARAMTER_DESCRIPTION question | berntd | RDM Interpretation Questions | 14 | February 9th, 2015 03:54 PM |
| CAPTURE_PRESET pdl? | berntd | RDM Interpretation Questions | 4 | October 19th, 2009 09:52 PM |
| PDL size and manufacturer specific parameter ID's | jamie | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 5 | July 13th, 2009 12:31 AM |
| Is there a minimum required PID list for sub-devices? | p_richart | RDM Interpretation Questions | 4 | November 7th, 2008 01:04 PM |