E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums  

Go Back   E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums > RDM Developer Forums > RDM General Implementation Discussion
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

RDM General Implementation Discussion General Discussion and questions relating to implementing RDM in a product.

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old January 26th, 2011   #3
MichaelStickel
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2
Default

Yes, you are right, this is a wrong configuration.
But that is what can happen in the middle of a setup procedure.

Imagine following setup:
- One console (A) to which all lights are connected via dmx dmx-ports 1..3.
- Second console (B) connected to console (A) via 3 dmx universes to consoles dmx-ports 4..6.
- Console (A) controlls all the moving lights
- Console (B) controlls all the conventionals
[Console-B]--->[port4..6 | Console-A | port1..3] -----> Lights

and the following Workflow:
- Console (A) has all ports configured as output
- Console (B) has all outputs configured as outputs.
- The technican connects all the lights to port 1..3
- The technican connects three outputs of console (B) to ports 4..6 of console (A).
At this point the ports that connect the consoles are driving against each other.
- Now the operator configures the ports 4..6 of console (A) as inputs.
At this point anything is back to normal.

This is a situation that may happen. The duration depends on the time between connecting the two consoles and setting the right configuration.
MichaelStickel is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.