E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums  

Go Back   E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums > RDM Developer Forums > RDM Interpretation Questions

RDM Interpretation Questions Discussion and questions relating to interpreting and understanding the E1.20 RDM Standard.

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old December 15th, 2018   #12
sblair
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 441
Send a message via AIM to sblair Send a message via MSN to sblair
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mikemac View Post
Why a NACK and not an ACK? Since the footprint is zero, the device isn't going to use any slots so it really shouldn't matter what the DMX address is set to. I would think returning a NACK to a controller could confuse it as it thinks it is sending a valid request.
Mike, welcome to the forums!

There's two issues here. If the Footprint is zero then that means the Start Address PID is probably not a supported PID. The language in the current version of RDM creates some confusion here because the Start Address PID isn't one that is supposed to be sent in a SUPPORTED_PARAMETERS but it is also allowed not required if it doesn't have a footprint.

The other scenario is that the general view is that a device shouldn't ACK something unless the action has been completed. If you send a SET and it didn't actually do the set then that should be a NACK. If it allows you to actually change the address for use with other personalities that do have a non-zero footprint, then I agree that would be an ACK.
__________________
Scott M. Blair
RDM Protocol Forums Admin
sblair is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to handle DMX Footprint overrun RobbG RDM General Implementation Discussion 3 May 8th, 2017 08:42 AM
change parameter setting ilek79 RDM General Implementation Discussion 4 January 12th, 2017 09:15 PM
Second configurable DMX address stefkuhb RDM General Implementation Discussion 5 October 22nd, 2014 08:17 AM
DMX Addressing when Footprint is Zero Mark_C RDM General Implementation Discussion 8 January 17th, 2010 10:47 AM
Sub-device response to SET/GET DMX512 start address p_richart RDM Interpretation Questions 2 September 29th, 2006 09:27 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.