|
|
|||||||
| RDM General Implementation Discussion General Discussion and questions relating to implementing RDM in a product. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
May 5th, 2017
|
#1 |
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 3
|
How to handle DMX Footprint overrun
Hi All,
I've just had an interesting question proposed to me by some other people in my company. How should a responded behave in a situation where the DMX_START_ADDRESS of a device (root or sub-device) is set to a value greater than (512 - DMX_FOOTPRINT) Should this behavior be the same for both DMX_START_ADDRESS and DMX_BLOCK_ADDRESS? My current implementation is an LED driver with 12 sub-devices, each containing 4 channels, if DMX_BLOCK_ADDRESS is used to set the start address of the sub-devices so that any have a DMX_START_ADDRESS above 512 they will set their start addresses to 512. Is there any more guidance on best/recommended practice in this situation? Thanks in advance, // Robb |
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| How should master handle receiving DMX after sending request? | berntd | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 5 | June 30th, 2016 08:59 PM |
| DMX Addressing when Footprint is Zero | Mark_C | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 8 | January 17th, 2010 10:47 AM |
Threaded Mode