![]() |
|
|||||||
| RDM Interpretation Questions Discussion and questions relating to interpreting and understanding the E1.20 RDM Standard. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Task Group Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 181
|
E1.20 Document Error
Section 6.6.3 ACK_TIMER states that the response is a 16bit unsigned field .... (PDL 0x02) BUT the example that follows shows a response with a PDL of 0x04 and a 32 bit number, which is inconsistent. Can we please agree that the response for ACK_TIMER is indeed 16bit? Presumably a document Erratta needs to be submitted to Karl ? regards Peter |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Administrator
|
ACK_TIMER is indeed 16-bit.
__________________
Scott M. Blair ![]() RDM Protocol Forums Admin Last edited by sblair; January 19th, 2007 at 08:13 PM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| ACK_TIMER Handling | ericthegeek | RDM General Implementation Discussion | 8 | January 20th, 2011 08:15 PM |
| ACK_TIMER, QUEUED Messages | berntd | RDM Interpretation Questions | 1 | November 12th, 2008 10:02 PM |
| Table 6-6 Checksum Example Error | prwatE120 | RDM Interpretation Questions | 1 | January 19th, 2007 06:49 PM |
| Request in the middle of ACK_TIMER | endoftheworld | RDM Interpretation Questions | 1 | July 13th, 2006 10:53 PM |
| Error counters | Nigel Worsley | RDM Interpretation Questions | 1 | July 3rd, 2006 03:42 PM |