E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums  

Go Back   E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums > Search Forums

Showing results 1 to 49 of 49
Search took 0.00 seconds.
Search: Posts Made By: nomis52
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion October 25th, 2015
Replies: 7
Views: 7,244
Posted By nomis52
I've reproduced this issue with the Enttec MK 2...

I've reproduced this issue with the Enttec MK 2 and have raised the issue with them.
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion May 16th, 2015
Replies: 0
Views: 3,501
Posted By nomis52
UID / EUID convertor

We've given the rdm.openlighting.org website a visual refresh and as part of this project we added a UID <-> EUID convertor.

http://rdm.openlighting.org/tools

We'll be adding some more dev...
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion March 25th, 2015
Replies: 7
Views: 7,244
Posted By nomis52
alvangee: can you open another issue on the...

alvangee: can you open another issue on the github site please so we can track this. From my quick looks it appears this is a problem with the Enttec USB device.
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion November 25th, 2014
Replies: 2
Views: 4,221
Posted By nomis52
Hi Daniel, It's fine to have a discussion...

Hi Daniel,

It's fine to have a discussion here, but please submit the request during public review of E1.37-5 . It was approved for public review last week, so the public review period should open...
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions November 2nd, 2014
Replies: 0
Views: 2,926
Posted By nomis52
E1.37-2 Errata

Eric pointed this out:

For DNS_HOSTNAME the PDL Fields say "0x00 - 0x3F" but the text says "1 to 63 characters".

My take is that controllers shouldn't try to set a hostname to the empty...
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion June 24th, 2014
Replies: 7
Views: 5,747
Posted By nomis52
I've included PAN_LOCK and TILT_LOCK in the...

I've included PAN_LOCK and TILT_LOCK in the E1.37-5 draft.
Forum: RDM Marketplace Discussion March 12th, 2014
Replies: 4
Views: 6,407
Posted By nomis52
http://www.rdmtests.org, it has very good...

http://www.rdmtests.org, it has very good coverage of E1.37-1.

Simon
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions March 7th, 2014
Replies: 4
Views: 4,158
Posted By nomis52
This has been fixed. In the future please report...

This has been fixed. In the future please report bugs like this on the rdm-testing@ mailing list or file issues in the tracker https://github.com/OpenLightingProject/ola/issues

Simon
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions January 28th, 2014
Replies: 13
Views: 10,131
Posted By nomis52
My interpretation (and from all but one device...

My interpretation (and from all but one device with the gear I've tested with) is that status messages are asserted when the condition occurs and then, once the message is collected by the...
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions January 27th, 2014
Replies: 13
Views: 10,131
Posted By nomis52
This is how I would implement a responder. On...

This is how I would implement a responder. On receiving a GET QUEUED_MESSAGE:

- if the requested status type is STATUS_GET_LAST_MESSAGE, return the same response as last time.
- otherwise, if...
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions November 7th, 2013
Replies: 1
Views: 3,645
Posted By nomis52
Hi Jacob , Due to limitations with the...

Hi Jacob ,

Due to limitations with the RDM-over-ArtNet protocol the tests won't work with the ArtNet plugin. You'll need to use one of the supported devices listed at...
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion September 2nd, 2013
Replies: 0
Views: 2,845
Posted By nomis52
RDM Responder tests updated

Hi everyone,

I spent the long weekend here updating the RDM tests to cover E1.37-1 and some basic sub device tests. There are now 402 test cases.

This will be picked up in the 0.8.32 release...
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions July 29th, 2013
Replies: 3
Views: 3,669
Posted By nomis52
Well at most it can be an advisory message, since...

Well at most it can be an advisory message, since there is nothing in the standard that enforces it (although it makes complete sense).
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions July 28th, 2013
Replies: 3
Views: 3,669
Posted By nomis52
Another BLOCK_ADDRESS question

I'm busy adding responder tests for the E1.37-1 PIDs. I'm having trouble deciding what I should expect for GET DMX_BLOCK_ADDRESS in the following situation:

i) the DMX_BLOCK_ADDRESS pid is...
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion July 19th, 2013
Replies: 2
Views: 4,225
Posted By nomis52
I agree with Eric here (sub-devices only),...

I agree with Eric here (sub-devices only), although I don't think the standard calls this out.

It does however say:

"All sub-devices shall report an identical list for SUPPORTED_PARAMETERS....
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions May 6th, 2013
Replies: 14
Views: 8,417
Posted By nomis52
A responder shouldn't be manipulating the labels...

A responder shouldn't be manipulating the labels set by a controller (except for truncating which is allowed by the standard). Spaces may or may not be significant when the label is shown to the user...
Forum: RDM User Discussion April 3rd, 2013
Replies: 5
Views: 7,748
Posted By nomis52
Austen have you tried contacting ETC support?

Austen have you tried contacting ETC support?
Forum: RDM User Discussion April 2nd, 2013
Replies: 5
Views: 7,748
Posted By nomis52
I asked someone I know at ETC and this is what...

I asked someone I know at ETC and this is what they replied with:

To get device feedback such as RDM errors in Congo you have to open the feedback tab found in the Browser->About->Dimmer/Device...
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion January 18th, 2013
Replies: 5
Views: 5,141
Posted By nomis52
That's how I consider it to work but other's...

That's how I consider it to work but other's probably disagree. The queued message acts as a signal to the controller that it should send a GET QUEUED_MESSAGE. It's legal to respond with a...
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion August 8th, 2012
Replies: 8
Views: 5,666
Posted By nomis52
Hi Laurent, As you've discovered, OLA is...

Hi Laurent,

As you've discovered, OLA is pretty strict about what it will accept. It's designed this way so people discover problems early. That said, there was a bug where the discovery process...
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions June 15th, 2012
Replies: 6
Views: 7,436
Posted By nomis52
On the other hand, the controller would also see...

On the other hand, the controller would also see a non-0 message count, which indicates that there is more messages in the queue.




The problem is though that if there are proxies in the...
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions June 14th, 2012
Replies: 6
Views: 7,436
Posted By nomis52
I'd expect the value not to be changed, and the...

I'd expect the value not to be changed, and the controller (or user) to retry later.

RDM controllers *have* to support queued messages if they are to work with proxies and any responder which uses...
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion June 9th, 2012
Replies: 11
Views: 13,548
Posted By nomis52
I tested 1.8.0rc1 on mac and can't find any...

I tested 1.8.0rc1 on mac and can't find any problems. Thanks for this.
Forum: RDM Marketplace Discussion April 24th, 2012
Replies: 3
Views: 6,330
Posted By nomis52
There is data on personalities & sensors for many...

There is data on personalities & sensors for many of the responders. I just realized I broke the javascript code that renders it. I've fixed it now, just make sure you force-reload to get the new js....
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion April 16th, 2012
Replies: 11
Views: 13,548
Posted By nomis52
Thanks for doing this. You can generate this...

Thanks for doing this.

You can generate this traffic yourself using OLA (http://www.opendmx.net/index.php/OLA). Start up an instance on two hosts, patch the Dummy RDM responder to an ArtNet...
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion March 3rd, 2012
Replies: 7
Views: 5,702
Posted By nomis52
When we reopen E1.20 and clean up the...

When we reopen E1.20 and clean up the PARAMETER_DESCRIPTION PID we should fix this. Scott can you add it to the TODO list?

Simon
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion March 2nd, 2012
Replies: 7
Views: 5,702
Posted By nomis52
I second Eric's recommendation not to do this. I...

I second Eric's recommendation not to do this. I haven't seen a controller that supports the definition of a manufacturer specific PID changing without requiring human intervention.

Also the PID...
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion February 23rd, 2012
Replies: 2
Views: 4,316
Posted By nomis52
Like Eric, I don't know of a product that will do...

Like Eric, I don't know of a product that will do this out the box. You may want to try contacting these companies:

http://www.helluk.com/
http://www.jese.co.uk/
http://www.dfd.com/
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions February 15th, 2012
Replies: 6
Views: 5,672
Posted By nomis52
I haven't seen the first case before. Case...

I haven't seen the first case before.

Case #2 occurs if you have multiple layers of proxies. The ACK_TIMER as a response to the queued message will be the ACK_TIMER sent by the second proxy. You...
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion January 4th, 2012
Replies: 11
Views: 7,581
Posted By nomis52
OLA supports RDM over ArtNet. I haven't added sub...

OLA supports RDM over ArtNet. I haven't added sub devices to the web UI but now that I have a device to test with I can bump that up the list.

Simon
Forum: RDM Marketplace Discussion October 5th, 2011
Replies: 3
Views: 6,330
Posted By nomis52
RDM Device Model Index: please send me device model IDs if you have them!

I've started collecting information about the known RDM device model IDs that are in use. You can see what I've got so far at http://rdm.openlighting.org/ (click on the Device Model tab).

Please...
Forum: RDM Timing Discussion August 18th, 2011
Replies: 9
Views: 12,266
Posted By nomis52
This came up at the most recent plugfest. The...

This came up at the most recent plugfest. The responder tests now have an additional flag --broadcast_write_delay which you can use to adjust the delay between sending a broadcast set and the next...
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion August 18th, 2011
Replies: 7
Views: 7,082
Posted By nomis52
I agree with Eric. Responders should be strict in...

I agree with Eric. Responders should be strict in what they accept. Anything else encourages sloppy programming on the controller side.
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion March 17th, 2011
Replies: 2
Views: 5,023
Posted By nomis52
Responding with an ACK where too much data is...

Responding with an ACK where too much data is provided (like the example you provided) will result in a warning but not a test failure. Responding to a PID that requires data with an ACK generates a...
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions March 6th, 2011
Replies: 4
Views: 5,669
Posted By nomis52
What's the state of the -20XX version? Can we get...

What's the state of the -20XX version? Can we get the contradiction removed before it's standardized?
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion March 6th, 2011
Replies: 2
Views: 5,023
Posted By nomis52
RDM Responder Tests are Ready

I've completed most of the work on the E1.20 responder tests now. As you can see from the output below the test suite has 162 tests as well as a bunch of checks for warning and advisory messages. In...
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions March 6th, 2011
Replies: 4
Views: 5,669
Posted By nomis52
Question about resetting sensors

The standard states:

"The SET_COMMAND may be used in conjunction with SENSOR_VALUE to reset or clear a given sensor. When a sensor is successfully reset the values for Present, Lowest/Highest,...
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion January 20th, 2011
Replies: 8
Views: 8,407
Posted By nomis52
I've gone ahead and added ADVISORY messages. You...

I've gone ahead and added ADVISORY messages. You can read more about the entire test framework here: http://opendmx.net/index.php/Writing_RDM_Responder_Tests
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion January 15th, 2011
Replies: 9
Views: 7,883
Posted By nomis52
As a couple of you know I've come up with a...

As a couple of you know I've come up with a different approach to this problem - the online PID definition index: http://rdm.openlighting.org/

This provides a structured way of describing a PID's...
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion January 7th, 2011
Replies: 8
Views: 8,407
Posted By nomis52
Scott: I agree with this view. I know Eric does...

Scott: I agree with this view. I know Eric does as well so it looks like the majority support this.



Ok, I'll go forward with my interpretation. At the moment the test framework just has ERROR...
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion December 21st, 2010
Replies: 8
Views: 8,407
Posted By nomis52
Bump. This problem appears to be getting...

Bump.

This problem appears to be getting worse as more responders become available. What are the plans to address it?

I'm writing RDM test cases now and according to the standard, a device...
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion September 6th, 2010
Replies: 13
Views: 9,904
Posted By nomis52
Agreed, when's the next revision due out :) ?

Agreed, when's the next revision due out :) ?
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion September 6th, 2010
Replies: 13
Views: 9,904
Posted By nomis52
Eric and I did a bit of testing with an ArtNet...

Eric and I did a bit of testing with an ArtNet node yesterday. I've documented the behavior at http://opendmx.net/index.php/ArtNet,_RDM_and_Packet_Interleaving
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion September 5th, 2010
Replies: 13
Views: 9,904
Posted By nomis52
Here's a related problem: The standard states...

Here's a related problem: The standard states "The responder shall abort a partial transfer of overflow data for a PID when receiving a command
for a different PID before the overflow data transfer...
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion September 5th, 2010
Replies: 13
Views: 9,904
Posted By nomis52
Thanks, that's what I expected. Is there a bug...

Thanks, that's what I expected. Is there a bug list for open issues where these things are tracked or do people just remember to bring them up at the next meeting?
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion September 5th, 2010
Replies: 13
Views: 9,904
Posted By nomis52
Correctly handling ACK_OVERFLOW

What's the correct behavior for this? The standard says "the controller should continue to send get commands for the same PID" but mentions nothing about what the PD field should contain.

Does...
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion July 6th, 2010
Replies: 6
Views: 6,520
Posted By nomis52
I building a multi input -> multi output rdm...

I building a multi input -> multi output rdm message router (which leads to other interesting problems) and I'm trying to decide if I optimize the UID -> output port data structure. I can make the...
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion July 5th, 2010
Replies: 6
Views: 6,520
Posted By nomis52
Ah sorry, reading my post I've realized it's...

Ah sorry, reading my post I've realized it's ambiguous. By 'UID set' I mean the group of UIDs that were discovered for a universe.

So I'm asking for the relative frequency of these two events:
...
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion June 27th, 2010
Replies: 6
Views: 6,520
Posted By nomis52
Relative frequency of UID set changes to RDM messages events

Hi,

I'd like someone to validate an assumption I've made while writing an RDM implementation or tell me that I'm completely wrong :).

I'm looking for the relative frequency of UID set changes...
Showing results 1 to 49 of 49

 
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.