E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums
>
Search Forums
Search Results
User Name
Remember Me?
Password
Register
FAQ
Community
Calendar
Today's Posts
Search
Community Links
Members List
Search Forums
Show Threads
Show Posts
Tag Search
Advanced Search
Go to Page...
Showing results 1 to 9 of 9
Search took
0.00
seconds.
Search:
Posts Made By:
hamish
Forum:
RDM Interpretation Questions
October 28th, 2010
Replies:
28
Self test description question
Views:
32,505
Posted By
hamish
Still to be resolved
This issue is one that remains open and one I discussed at the thin end of the CPWG on Monday. Anyone who was at the last Plugfest may have witnessed the result of testing for 255 self tests, not a...
Forum:
RDM Interpretation Questions
March 31st, 2010
Replies:
28
Self test description question
Views:
32,505
Posted By
hamish
Cardinal Index
A PID SUPPORTED_SELFTESTS would in this case be in lieu of SELFTEST_COUNT so no real difference in overhead.
I make the assumption that any responder supporting many self tests will not see an...
Forum:
RDM Interpretation Questions
March 30th, 2010
Replies:
28
Self test description question
Views:
32,505
Posted By
hamish
Permitting a cardinal index may be put in the...
Permitting a cardinal index may be put in the same context as for personalities. For consistency, I would suggest that indexes be ordinal from 1.
In the case that an responder does not utilise a...
Forum:
RDM Interpretation Questions
March 30th, 2010
Replies:
28
Self test description question
Views:
32,505
Posted By
hamish
BTW
http://www.rdmprotocol.org/forums/showthread.php?t=24
Looks like this one is doing a lap of honour;)
Forum:
RDM Interpretation Questions
March 30th, 2010
Replies:
28
Self test description question
Views:
32,505
Posted By
hamish
Going Forwards
Looking toward the future, making SELFTEST_DESCRIPTION mandatory when SELFTEST are supported would be the minimum, adding SELFTEST_COUNT would make everything beautifully simple.
I don't see a...
Forum:
RDM Interpretation Questions
March 30th, 2010
Replies:
28
Self test description question
Views:
32,505
Posted By
hamish
You never know!
Gerry
I'm working from the perspective of a generic controller and therefore have to cater for all eventualities. I'd recommend the exercise to anyone who likes a challenge, its like a box of...
Forum:
RDM Interpretation Questions
March 29th, 2010
Replies:
28
Self test description question
Views:
32,505
Posted By
hamish
Multifarious consideration
Hi Eric.
Yes, while I agree that's true, would it not also be true to say that a well designed standard would foresee this, as it does (to some extent) with required PIDs?
I have here, a...
Forum:
RDM Interpretation Questions
March 29th, 2010
Replies:
28
Self test description question
Views:
32,505
Posted By
hamish
Poke & Hope!
Hi Eric
Agreed.
The unfortunate consequence is that it makes the control application look somewhat hapless. In the event of no description being available, the user must be eloquently asked to...
Forum:
RDM Interpretation Questions
March 29th, 2010
Replies:
28
Self test description question
Views:
32,505
Posted By
hamish
Ouch
A small point to add here, I have found that the PID SELF_TEST_DESCRIPTION may not be implimented.:confused:
This is an area of the standard that could definately benefit from a revision.
...
Showing results 1 to 9 of 9
Forum Jump
User Control Panel
Private Messages
Subscriptions
Who's Online
Search Forums
Forums Home
RDM Developer Forums
RDM General Implementation Discussion
RDM Interpretation Questions
RDM Physical Layer/Hardware Discussion
RDM Timing Discussion
RDMnet (E1.33) General Discussion
E1.31/sACN General Discussion
RDM User Forums
RDM User Discussion
DMX512 Discussion
RDM Marketplace Discussion
All times are GMT -6. The time now is
03:39 AM
.
Contact Us
-
RDM Protocol Forums
-
Archive
-
Top
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.