E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums  

Go Back   E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums > Search Forums

Showing results 1 to 4 of 4
Search took 0.00 seconds.
Search: Posts Made By: ericthegeek
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions February 9th, 2015
Replies: 14
Views: 14,728
Posted By ericthegeek
A SUPPORTED_PARAMETERS response with a PDL of...

A SUPPORTED_PARAMETERS response with a PDL of 0x00 is really a corner case. Most of the time you won't need it.

Arguably you could respond with 0x00 if you don't support any of the optional PIDs....
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions February 5th, 2015
Replies: 14
Views: 14,728
Posted By ericthegeek
Table A-3 in E1.20 makes it clear that if you...

Table A-3 in E1.20 makes it clear that if you only support the required PIDs you do not have to support SUPPORTED_PARAMETERS.

That being said, I'd strongly encourage you to support...
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions October 1st, 2009
Replies: 14
Views: 14,728
Posted By ericthegeek
There are already responders in the wild that...

There are already responders in the wild that don't support the DMX_START_ADDRESS PID. Even if it were to be made mandatory in a future version of the document, controllers would still have to...
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions September 30th, 2009
Replies: 14
Views: 14,728
Posted By ericthegeek
> Although you could argue that they are...

> Although you could argue that they are "non-compliant"
> products, I would not be that upset to see products that
> declared the existence of manufacturer specific PIDS in
> there list of...
Showing results 1 to 4 of 4

 
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.