Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
April 25th, 2012
|
Replies: 11
Views: 25,187
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
September 2nd, 2011
|
Replies: 7
Views: 14,824
I totally agree that if the length does not...
I totally agree that if the length does not match, it is something wrong (especially if message length is not consistent with PDL)... But there are just so many things that the responder could cope...
|
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions
September 1st, 2011
|
Replies: 8
Views: 18,051
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
September 1st, 2011
|
Replies: 7
Views: 14,824
I agree with you, to some degree...
Problem...
I agree with you, to some degree...
Problem is, that out in the real world the controller is not the piece of equipment that will get the blame if your responder does not work, the user just knows...
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
March 17th, 2011
|
Replies: 2
Views: 11,015
|
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions
February 17th, 2011
|
Replies: 8
Views: 16,445
Scott, yes of course the best would be to get...
Scott, yes of course the best would be to get everybody doing everything right. In the meanwhile unfortunately we'll have to do a lot of work-arounds. Especially for us doing in-line devices that is...
|
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions
February 17th, 2011
|
Replies: 8
Views: 16,445
Our multi-universe transmitters have multiple...
Our multi-universe transmitters have multiple responder ports, however I've chosen to not use the binding UID because at some point I ran into a controller that did not handle it (not just that it...
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
May 25th, 2010
|
Replies: 33
Views: 32,582
When saying that I assume that you mean queued...
When saying that I assume that you mean queued messages generated by an event at the responser (changing of DMX address, etc)?
Queued messages in response to to for instance a SET:DMX_START_ADDRESS...
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
May 25th, 2010
|
Replies: 33
Views: 32,582
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
May 24th, 2010
|
Replies: 33
Views: 32,582
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
April 29th, 2010
|
Replies: 3
Views: 10,549
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
March 29th, 2010
|
Replies: 3
Views: 10,549
European RDM plug fest
LumenRadio AB invites all manufacturers with an interrest in RDM to Gothenburg, Sweden, May 21-23 for an RDM plug fest. The plug fest is free of charge and is open for all engineers having an...
|
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions
March 29th, 2010
|
Replies: 28
Views: 32,586
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
March 3rd, 2010
|
Replies: 33
Views: 32,582
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
March 2nd, 2010
|
Replies: 33
Views: 32,582
How come that everybody assumes that queued...
How come that everybody assumes that queued messages needs to actually be queued, in some of my devices that support queued messages I only queue the message type. Hence it need only a few bits to...
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
January 15th, 2010
|
Replies: 8
Views: 13,490
I agree with Eric and Scott.
As you describe...
I agree with Eric and Scott.
As you describe it, you should set the root device to having a footprint of 48 and the sub-devices to have a footprint of 0.
You don't have to support SLOT_INFO, but...
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
November 11th, 2009
|
Replies: 12
Views: 26,439
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
November 10th, 2009
|
Replies: 12
Views: 26,439
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
November 10th, 2009
|
Replies: 9
Views: 14,503
Would be interesting to know what controller it...
Would be interesting to know what controller it is... In the current version of our controller we use the GET:QUEUED_MESSAGE even if the device doesn't support it and use the NACK only to keep track...
|
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions
October 16th, 2009
|
Replies: 13
Views: 21,521
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
October 14th, 2009
|
Replies: 6
Views: 13,440
If you are planning to have the device "out of...
If you are planning to have the device "out of the box" supported by most controllers I would suggest having 64 personalities.
Having manufacturer specific PIDs often don't blend in very well in...
|
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions
October 14th, 2009
|
Replies: 13
Views: 21,521
I agree with Eric that if the subdevice is not...
I agree with Eric that if the subdevice is not patchable and does not consume any DMX channels then the SLOT_INFO should be on the root device since then the root device is what is consuming the...
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
October 1st, 2009
|
Replies: 2
Views: 8,656
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
October 1st, 2009
|
Replies: 5
Views: 11,045
I don't think the standard references to...
I don't think the standard references to additional information at the website as it does with B-2 etc.
In that case the core document would have to be opened t adding the constant, or adding a...
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
October 1st, 2009
|
Replies: 3
Views: 11,146
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
September 30th, 2009
|
Replies: 2
Views: 8,656
Figure 7-2: Device Discovery Process
Some time ago I noticed that this flowchart may lead to some problems if people use it as an implementation guide...
The flow chart does not handle ghosted UIDs very well.
For instance:
The...
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
September 30th, 2009
|
Replies: 5
Views: 11,045
|
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions
September 30th, 2009
|
Replies: 14
Views: 24,508
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
July 25th, 2009
|
Replies: 1
Views: 10,561
I just want to thank all people attending the...
I just want to thank all people attending the plugfest, I attended for the first time and I think it was great. Especially to see that all people are so helpful to those who had problems, I think...
|