Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
February 25th, 2011
|
Replies: 16
Views: 22,950
Hi Eric,
In general I would fully agree as...
Hi Eric,
In general I would fully agree as standards need to be trustworthy. Still, this is a clarification, not a change. Furthermore, for this particular one I see little harm done for existing...
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
February 23rd, 2011
|
Replies: 16
Views: 22,950
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
February 23rd, 2011
|
Replies: 16
Views: 22,950
In this particular case it might also be that...
In this particular case it might also be that actually not mutch harm is done when clarifying this as originally intended.
It seems that very few (if any) actual responders currently implement...
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
February 23rd, 2011
|
Replies: 16
Views: 22,950
For sure true. But this essentially means that...
For sure true. But this essentially means that since the standard was unclear it could be either way, right?
I would still suggest addressing this issue in a future standard version. One example...
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
February 23rd, 2011
|
Replies: 16
Views: 22,950
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
February 23rd, 2011
|
Replies: 16
Views: 22,950
Good info!
For me it feels like the standard...
Good info!
For me it feels like the standard just leaves this open.
What eventually counts is what You can rely on in the real world. There, I would not even dare to assume anything about...
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
February 23rd, 2011
|
Replies: 16
Views: 22,950
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
February 23rd, 2011
|
Replies: 16
Views: 22,950
SELF_TEST_DESCRIPTION index range
Dear RDM friends,
I am somewhat unhappy with implementing the SELF_TEST_DESCRIPTION parameter.
The problem is, that in my understanding the current spec provides no indication of the potential...
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
February 23rd, 2011
|
Replies: 6
Views: 14,237
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
February 23rd, 2011
|
Replies: 6
Views: 14,237
Hy Ryan,
the gateway timeout stuff is as...
Hy Ryan,
the gateway timeout stuff is as eric suggested related to the involved ethernet gateway and no reason to worry if it happens only occaisionally. The system will deal with that.
You...
|
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions
October 14th, 2009
|
Replies: 4
Views: 11,883
|
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions
October 8th, 2009
|
Replies: 4
Views: 11,883
PARAMETER_DESCRIPTION data type semantics
Hi,
I have two questions:
1) the data type description refers to arrays rather than single elements. Does this mean, that given a data type of say DWORD, the PDLen must be a fixed multiple of 4...
|