Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions
November 28th, 2021
|
Replies: 1
Views: 5,704
|
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions
May 2nd, 2012
|
Replies: 12
Views: 16,946
|
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions
May 1st, 2012
|
Replies: 12
Views: 16,946
|
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions
April 30th, 2012
|
Replies: 12
Views: 16,946
|
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions
April 30th, 2012
|
Replies: 12
Views: 16,946
|
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions
April 30th, 2012
|
Replies: 12
Views: 16,946
Sub Device required PIDs
At the plug-fest Bob presented an interesting point: Do Sub Devices need to implement the minimum required PIDs list?
My common sense answer was yes, but review of the document suggests this is not...
|
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions
December 1st, 2006
|
Replies: 4
Views: 14,720
Hi Fokko,
Picking up on the question re...
Hi Fokko,
Picking up on the question re start address and footprint. We take the following approach:
1) Use sub devices if the product is modular.
2) When we set the start address of the...
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
December 1st, 2006
|
Replies: 3
Views: 12,346
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
August 1st, 2006
|
Replies: 4
Views: 12,323
Hi guys,
Apologies if I caused confusion. I...
Hi guys,
Apologies if I caused confusion. I was referring to the Task Group 'draft version' numbers, forgetting that the first release of the standard is called V1.0.
To clarify:
All...
|