E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums  

Go Back   E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums > Search Forums

Showing results 1 to 9 of 9
Search took 0.00 seconds.
Search: Posts Made By: wayne@artisticlicence.com
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions November 28th, 2021
Replies: 1
Views: 770
Hi, Yes the sub device count can change with...

Hi,
Yes the sub device count can change with personality. In fact, that is probably the biggest use of personality.
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions May 2nd, 2012
Replies: 12
Views: 13,343
Eric, I also agree although I have ensured our...

Eric, I also agree although I have ensured our implementation is tolerant of responders including or excluding mandated pids, root or sub-device.
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions May 1st, 2012
Replies: 12
Views: 13,343
Thanks Eric. I'd agree on DEVICE_INFO - not much...

Thanks Eric. I'd agree on DEVICE_INFO - not much point having a sub-device where you can't get start and foot!
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions April 30th, 2012
Replies: 12
Views: 13,343
Great - works for me.

Great - works for me.
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions April 30th, 2012
Replies: 12
Views: 13,343
So the answer is that SUPPORTED_PARAMETERS is the...

So the answer is that SUPPORTED_PARAMETERS is the only pid mandated for a sub-device.
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions April 30th, 2012
Replies: 12
Views: 13,343
Sub Device required PIDs

At the plug-fest Bob presented an interesting point: Do Sub Devices need to implement the minimum required PIDs list?
My common sense answer was yes, but review of the document suggests this is not...
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions December 1st, 2006
Replies: 4
Views: 11,666
Hi Fokko, Picking up on the question re...

Hi Fokko,

Picking up on the question re start address and footprint. We take the following approach:

1) Use sub devices if the product is modular.
2) When we set the start address of the...
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion December 1st, 2006
Replies: 3
Views: 10,099
Scott, Steve, Our gear is still on draft...

Scott, Steve,

Our gear is still on draft V1.0. I'll post when we release.

Cheers

Wayne
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion August 1st, 2006
Replies: 4
Views: 10,254
Hi guys, Apologies if I caused confusion. I...

Hi guys,

Apologies if I caused confusion. I was referring to the Task Group 'draft version' numbers, forgetting that the first release of the standard is called V1.0.

To clarify:

All...
Showing results 1 to 9 of 9

 
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:39 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.