E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums
>
Search Forums
Search Results
User Name
Remember Me?
Password
Register
FAQ
Community
Calendar
Today's Posts
Search
Community Links
Members List
Search Forums
Show Threads
Show Posts
Tag Search
Advanced Search
Go to Page...
Showing results 1 to 8 of 8
Search took
0.00
seconds.
Search:
Posts Made By:
tim_ecue
Forum:
RDM General Implementation Discussion
February 25th, 2011
Replies:
16
SELF_TEST_DESCRIPTION index range
Views:
23,131
Posted By
tim_ecue
Hi Eric, In general I would fully agree as...
Hi Eric,
In general I would fully agree as standards need to be trustworthy. Still, this is a clarification, not a change. Furthermore, for this particular one I see little harm done for existing...
Forum:
RDM General Implementation Discussion
February 23rd, 2011
Replies:
16
SELF_TEST_DESCRIPTION index range
Views:
23,131
Posted By
tim_ecue
"should" + advice that otherwise the test may not...
"should" + advice that otherwise the test may not be detected by many control software systems would be sufficient.
Anything less than should + "otherwise it will not really work for your...
Forum:
RDM General Implementation Discussion
February 23rd, 2011
Replies:
16
SELF_TEST_DESCRIPTION index range
Views:
23,131
Posted By
tim_ecue
In this particular case it might also be that...
In this particular case it might also be that actually not mutch harm is done when clarifying this as originally intended.
It seems that very few (if any) actual responders currently implement...
Forum:
RDM General Implementation Discussion
February 23rd, 2011
Replies:
16
SELF_TEST_DESCRIPTION index range
Views:
23,131
Posted By
tim_ecue
For sure true. But this essentially means that...
For sure true. But this essentially means that since the standard was unclear it could be either way, right?
I would still suggest addressing this issue in a future standard version. One example...
Forum:
RDM General Implementation Discussion
February 23rd, 2011
Replies:
16
SELF_TEST_DESCRIPTION index range
Views:
23,131
Posted By
tim_ecue
My favourite. Still, will it make it into the...
My favourite. Still, will it make it into the standard?
BTW: Yes, we have full E1.20 coverage in our upcoming sw release ... (or what I think full coverage is ;) )
Forum:
RDM General Implementation Discussion
February 23rd, 2011
Replies:
16
SELF_TEST_DESCRIPTION index range
Views:
23,131
Posted By
tim_ecue
Good info! For me it feels like the standard...
Good info!
For me it feels like the standard just leaves this open.
What eventually counts is what You can rely on in the real world. There, I would not even dare to assume anything about...
Forum:
RDM General Implementation Discussion
February 23rd, 2011
Replies:
16
SELF_TEST_DESCRIPTION index range
Views:
23,131
Posted By
tim_ecue
Hi Hamish, oops, I missed the other...
Hi Hamish,
oops, I missed the other discussion. Thanks for the advice!
Did You already see a device where the test numbers where not consecutive ?
Forum:
RDM General Implementation Discussion
February 23rd, 2011
Replies:
16
SELF_TEST_DESCRIPTION index range
Views:
23,131
Posted By
tim_ecue
SELF_TEST_DESCRIPTION index range
Dear RDM friends,
I am somewhat unhappy with implementing the SELF_TEST_DESCRIPTION parameter.
The problem is, that in my understanding the current spec provides no indication of the potential...
Showing results 1 to 8 of 8
Forum Jump
User Control Panel
Private Messages
Subscriptions
Who's Online
Search Forums
Forums Home
RDM Developer Forums
RDM General Implementation Discussion
RDM Interpretation Questions
RDM Physical Layer/Hardware Discussion
RDM Timing Discussion
RDMnet (E1.33) General Discussion
E1.31/sACN General Discussion
RDM User Forums
RDM User Discussion
DMX512 Discussion
RDM Marketplace Discussion
All times are GMT -6. The time now is
10:12 AM
.
Contact Us
-
RDM Protocol Forums
-
Archive
-
Top
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.