E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums  

Go Back   E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums > Search Forums
Reload this Page Search Results
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Showing results 1 to 5 of 5
Search took 0.00 seconds. Search: Posts Made By: wayne@artisticlicence.com
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions May 2nd, 2012
Replies: 12
Views: 16,804
Posted By wayne@artisticlicence.com
Eric, I also agree although I have ensured our...

Eric, I also agree although I have ensured our implementation is tolerant of responders including or excluding mandated pids, root or sub-device.
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions May 1st, 2012
Replies: 12
Views: 16,804
Posted By wayne@artisticlicence.com
Thanks Eric. I'd agree on DEVICE_INFO - not much...

Thanks Eric. I'd agree on DEVICE_INFO - not much point having a sub-device where you can't get start and foot!
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions April 30th, 2012
Replies: 12
Views: 16,804
Posted By wayne@artisticlicence.com
Great - works for me.

Great - works for me.
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions April 30th, 2012
Replies: 12
Views: 16,804
Posted By wayne@artisticlicence.com
So the answer is that SUPPORTED_PARAMETERS is the...

So the answer is that SUPPORTED_PARAMETERS is the only pid mandated for a sub-device.
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions April 30th, 2012
Replies: 12
Views: 16,804
Posted By wayne@artisticlicence.com
Sub Device required PIDs

At the plug-fest Bob presented an interesting point: Do Sub Devices need to implement the minimum required PIDs list?
My common sense answer was yes, but review of the document suggests this is not...
Showing results 1 to 5 of 5

 
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:27 PM.

Contact Us - RDM Protocol Forums - Archive - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.