Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
October 25th, 2015
|
Replies: 7
Views: 16,603
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
May 16th, 2015
|
Replies: 0
Views: 8,657
UID / EUID convertor
We've given the rdm.openlighting.org website a visual refresh and as part of this project we added a UID <-> EUID convertor.
http://rdm.openlighting.org/tools
We'll be adding some more dev...
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
March 25th, 2015
|
Replies: 7
Views: 16,603
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
November 25th, 2014
|
Replies: 2
Views: 9,922
Hi Daniel,
It's fine to have a discussion...
Hi Daniel,
It's fine to have a discussion here, but please submit the request during public review of E1.37-5 . It was approved for public review last week, so the public review period should open...
|
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions
November 2nd, 2014
|
Replies: 0
Views: 8,489
E1.37-2 Errata
Eric pointed this out:
For DNS_HOSTNAME the PDL Fields say "0x00 - 0x3F" but the text says "1 to 63 characters".
My take is that controllers shouldn't try to set a hostname to the empty...
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
June 24th, 2014
|
Replies: 7
Views: 13,767
|
Forum: RDM Marketplace Discussion
March 12th, 2014
|
Replies: 4
Views: 14,291
|
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions
March 7th, 2014
|
Replies: 4
Views: 9,796
|
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions
January 28th, 2014
|
Replies: 13
Views: 23,513
|
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions
January 27th, 2014
|
Replies: 13
Views: 23,513
This is how I would implement a responder. On...
This is how I would implement a responder. On receiving a GET QUEUED_MESSAGE:
- if the requested status type is STATUS_GET_LAST_MESSAGE, return the same response as last time.
- otherwise, if...
|
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions
November 7th, 2013
|
Replies: 1
Views: 9,675
Hi Jacob ,
Due to limitations with the...
Hi Jacob ,
Due to limitations with the RDM-over-ArtNet protocol the tests won't work with the ArtNet plugin. You'll need to use one of the supported devices listed at...
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
September 2nd, 2013
|
Replies: 0
Views: 6,922
RDM Responder tests updated
Hi everyone,
I spent the long weekend here updating the RDM tests to cover E1.37-1 and some basic sub device tests. There are now 402 test cases.
This will be picked up in the 0.8.32 release...
|
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions
July 29th, 2013
|
Replies: 3
Views: 9,151
|
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions
July 28th, 2013
|
Replies: 3
Views: 9,151
Another BLOCK_ADDRESS question
I'm busy adding responder tests for the E1.37-1 PIDs. I'm having trouble deciding what I should expect for GET DMX_BLOCK_ADDRESS in the following situation:
i) the DMX_BLOCK_ADDRESS pid is...
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
July 19th, 2013
|
Replies: 2
Views: 9,729
I agree with Eric here (sub-devices only),...
I agree with Eric here (sub-devices only), although I don't think the standard calls this out.
It does however say:
"All sub-devices shall report an identical list for SUPPORTED_PARAMETERS....
|
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions
May 6th, 2013
|
Replies: 14
Views: 18,723
|
Forum: RDM User Discussion
April 3rd, 2013
|
Replies: 5
Views: 16,122
|
Forum: RDM User Discussion
April 2nd, 2013
|
Replies: 5
Views: 16,122
I asked someone I know at ETC and this is what...
I asked someone I know at ETC and this is what they replied with:
To get device feedback such as RDM errors in Congo you have to open the feedback tab found in the Browser->About->Dimmer/Device...
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
January 18th, 2013
|
Replies: 5
Views: 10,286
That's how I consider it to work but other's...
That's how I consider it to work but other's probably disagree. The queued message acts as a signal to the controller that it should send a GET QUEUED_MESSAGE. It's legal to respond with a...
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
August 8th, 2012
|
Replies: 8
Views: 12,528
Hi Laurent,
As you've discovered, OLA is...
Hi Laurent,
As you've discovered, OLA is pretty strict about what it will accept. It's designed this way so people discover problems early. That said, there was a bug where the discovery process...
|
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions
June 15th, 2012
|
Replies: 6
Views: 14,952
|
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions
June 14th, 2012
|
Replies: 6
Views: 14,952
I'd expect the value not to be changed, and the...
I'd expect the value not to be changed, and the controller (or user) to retry later.
RDM controllers *have* to support queued messages if they are to work with proxies and any responder which uses...
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
June 9th, 2012
|
Replies: 11
Views: 25,187
|
Forum: RDM Marketplace Discussion
April 24th, 2012
|
Replies: 3
Views: 13,896
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
April 16th, 2012
|
Replies: 11
Views: 25,187
Thanks for doing this.
You can generate this...
Thanks for doing this.
You can generate this traffic yourself using OLA (http://www.opendmx.net/index.php/OLA). Start up an instance on two hosts, patch the Dummy RDM responder to an ArtNet...
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
March 3rd, 2012
|
Replies: 7
Views: 12,802
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
March 2nd, 2012
|
Replies: 7
Views: 12,802
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
February 23rd, 2012
|
Replies: 2
Views: 9,399
|
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions
February 15th, 2012
|
Replies: 6
Views: 12,664
I haven't seen the first case before.
Case...
I haven't seen the first case before.
Case #2 occurs if you have multiple layers of proxies. The ACK_TIMER as a response to the queued message will be the ACK_TIMER sent by the second proxy. You...
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
January 4th, 2012
|
Replies: 11
Views: 15,108
|
Forum: RDM Marketplace Discussion
October 5th, 2011
|
Replies: 3
Views: 13,896
|
Forum: RDM Timing Discussion
August 18th, 2011
|
Replies: 9
Views: 22,707
This came up at the most recent plugfest. The...
This came up at the most recent plugfest. The responder tests now have an additional flag --broadcast_write_delay which you can use to adjust the delay between sending a broadcast set and the next...
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
August 18th, 2011
|
Replies: 7
Views: 14,824
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
March 17th, 2011
|
Replies: 2
Views: 11,015
Responding with an ACK where too much data is...
Responding with an ACK where too much data is provided (like the example you provided) will result in a warning but not a test failure. Responding to a PID that requires data with an ACK generates a...
|
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions
March 6th, 2011
|
Replies: 4
Views: 11,702
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
March 6th, 2011
|
Replies: 2
Views: 11,015
RDM Responder Tests are Ready
I've completed most of the work on the E1.20 responder tests now. As you can see from the output below the test suite has 162 tests as well as a bunch of checks for warning and advisory messages. In...
|
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions
March 6th, 2011
|
Replies: 4
Views: 11,702
Question about resetting sensors
The standard states:
"The SET_COMMAND may be used in conjunction with SENSOR_VALUE to reset or clear a given sensor. When a sensor is successfully reset the values for Present, Lowest/Highest,...
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
January 20th, 2011
|
Replies: 8
Views: 15,686
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
January 15th, 2011
|
Replies: 9
Views: 21,247
As a couple of you know I've come up with a...
As a couple of you know I've come up with a different approach to this problem - the online PID definition index: http://rdm.openlighting.org/
This provides a structured way of describing a PID's...
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
January 7th, 2011
|
Replies: 8
Views: 15,686
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
December 21st, 2010
|
Replies: 8
Views: 15,686
Bump.
This problem appears to be getting...
Bump.
This problem appears to be getting worse as more responders become available. What are the plans to address it?
I'm writing RDM test cases now and according to the standard, a device...
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
September 6th, 2010
|
Replies: 13
Views: 18,733
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
September 6th, 2010
|
Replies: 13
Views: 18,733
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
September 5th, 2010
|
Replies: 13
Views: 18,733
Here's a related problem: The standard states...
Here's a related problem: The standard states "The responder shall abort a partial transfer of overflow data for a PID when receiving a command
for a different PID before the overflow data transfer...
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
September 5th, 2010
|
Replies: 13
Views: 18,733
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
September 5th, 2010
|
Replies: 13
Views: 18,733
Correctly handling ACK_OVERFLOW
What's the correct behavior for this? The standard says "the controller should continue to send get commands for the same PID" but mentions nothing about what the PD field should contain.
Does...
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
July 6th, 2010
|
Replies: 6
Views: 12,187
I building a multi input -> multi output rdm...
I building a multi input -> multi output rdm message router (which leads to other interesting problems) and I'm trying to decide if I optimize the UID -> output port data structure. I can make the...
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
July 5th, 2010
|
Replies: 6
Views: 12,187
Ah sorry, reading my post I've realized it's...
Ah sorry, reading my post I've realized it's ambiguous. By 'UID set' I mean the group of UIDs that were discovered for a universe.
So I'm asking for the relative frequency of these two events:
...
|
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion
June 27th, 2010
|
Replies: 6
Views: 12,187
|