E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums  

Go Back   E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums > Search Forums

Showing results 1 to 6 of 6
Search took 0.00 seconds.
Search: Posts Made By: ericthegeek
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion October 20th, 2009
Replies: 17
Views: 11,160
Posted By ericthegeek
> The way it sounds is like no matter what it...

> The way it sounds is like no matter what it asks for,
> it gets error warnings
...
> Surely if it asks for ERRORS, it needs to get errors
> and not warnings or advisories?

See table 10-1...
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion October 20th, 2009
Replies: 17
Views: 11,160
Posted By ericthegeek
> Does this mean if controller wants edvisory...

> Does this mean if controller wants edvisory status,
> all the response messsages MUST have the
> type = Advisory

No. If the controller asks for STATUS_WARNING, then the responder should...
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion October 20th, 2009
Replies: 17
Views: 11,160
Posted By ericthegeek
There's no standardized way to enunciate the end...

There's no standardized way to enunciate the end of an error condition.

There's been some discussion about this among the task group lately without reaching any real conclusion. It's a dicey...
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion October 19th, 2009
Replies: 17
Views: 11,160
Posted By ericthegeek
> An "ACK_BUSY" (with a timer) would be rather ...

> An "ACK_BUSY" (with a timer) would be rather
> useful in that instance

NACK w/ NR_BUFFER_FULL is not exactly what you're looking for, but is close enough to probably work.

RDM is not a...
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion October 19th, 2009
Replies: 17
Views: 11,160
Posted By ericthegeek
> Is it implied that a controller will leave the...

> Is it implied that a controller will leave the device
> alone if it receives and ACK_TIMER?

No, it's not implied. Many controllers will not send anything else to a responder until the...
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion October 19th, 2009
Replies: 17
Views: 11,160
Posted By ericthegeek
> Should I implement this pid? It's a nice...

> Should I implement this pid?

It's a nice way to deliver messages from the responder without the controller having to know what to ask for.

> I do not support queueed messages

Status...
Showing results 1 to 6 of 6

 
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.