E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums  

Go Back   E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums > Search Forums
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Showing results 1 to 7 of 7
Search took 0.00 seconds.
Search: Posts Made By: yxj-ae86
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion October 9th, 2025
Replies: 10
Views: 14,357
Posted By yxj-ae86
Got it, thank you so much

Got it, thank you so much
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion October 8th, 2025
Replies: 10
Views: 14,357
Posted By yxj-ae86
You have mentioned the answer, but I have missed...

You have mentioned the answer, but I have missed them:

The proxy does have to cache discovery information, and may be able to cache some read-only PIDs, but IMO it's not worth the hassle.

OK,...
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion October 8th, 2025
Replies: 10
Views: 14,357
Posted By yxj-ae86
For RDM protocol 6.3 Response Type Field Values,...

For RDM protocol 6.3 Response Type Field Values, when command class is DISCOVERY_COMMAND_RESPONSE, it does not support ACK_TIMER, so we need combine two ways: caching + ACK_TIMER to fully support RDM...
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion September 29th, 2025
Replies: 10
Views: 14,357
Posted By yxj-ae86
Thanks very much for so detailed reply. I have...

Thanks very much for so detailed reply.
I have a similar opinion, it is difficult to balance the caching period and response realtime ability. And yes, your post about ACK_TIMER is a few years ago,...
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion September 29th, 2025
Replies: 10
Views: 14,357
Posted By yxj-ae86
--RE: Yes, we want to support standard RDM...

--RE: Yes, we want to support standard RDM responder at the end of PLC communication.


--RE: Currently we want support this one.


--RE: this is not our plan.
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion September 28th, 2025
Replies: 10
Views: 14,357
Posted By yxj-ae86
Thanks for you reply. Best user experience,...

Thanks for you reply.

Best user experience, do you mean response time? And if choose ACK_TIMER+QUEUED_MESSAGE, only add about 50-100ms, I think it is acceptable.

Our concern is that whether...
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion September 27th, 2025
Replies: 10
Views: 14,357
Posted By yxj-ae86
For developing a "not fast" RDM proxy hardware, use ACK_timer or other method?

HI, RPMer, I am a RDM rookie.
Right now we are developing a RDM proxy, a power line communication hardware which convert RDM/DMX512 to PLC two-way.
There is one PLC proxy connects to the RDM master...
Showing results 1 to 7 of 7

 
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.