E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums
>
Search Forums
Search Results
User Name
Remember Me?
Password
Register
FAQ
Community
Calendar
Today's Posts
Search
Community Links
Members List
Search Forums
Show Threads
Show Posts
Tag Search
Advanced Search
Go to Page...
Showing results 1 to 7 of 7
Search took
0.00
seconds.
Search:
Posts Made By:
yxj-ae86
Forum:
RDM General Implementation Discussion
October 9th, 2025
Replies:
10
For developing a "not fast" RDM proxy hardware, use ACK_timer or other method?
Views:
14,357
Posted By
yxj-ae86
Got it, thank you so much
Got it, thank you so much
Forum:
RDM General Implementation Discussion
October 8th, 2025
Replies:
10
For developing a "not fast" RDM proxy hardware, use ACK_timer or other method?
Views:
14,357
Posted By
yxj-ae86
You have mentioned the answer, but I have missed...
You have mentioned the answer, but I have missed them:
The proxy does have to cache discovery information, and may be able to cache some read-only PIDs, but IMO it's not worth the hassle.
OK,...
Forum:
RDM General Implementation Discussion
October 8th, 2025
Replies:
10
For developing a "not fast" RDM proxy hardware, use ACK_timer or other method?
Views:
14,357
Posted By
yxj-ae86
For RDM protocol 6.3 Response Type Field Values,...
For RDM protocol 6.3 Response Type Field Values, when command class is DISCOVERY_COMMAND_RESPONSE, it does not support ACK_TIMER, so we need combine two ways: caching + ACK_TIMER to fully support RDM...
Forum:
RDM General Implementation Discussion
September 29th, 2025
Replies:
10
For developing a "not fast" RDM proxy hardware, use ACK_timer or other method?
Views:
14,357
Posted By
yxj-ae86
Thanks very much for so detailed reply. I have...
Thanks very much for so detailed reply.
I have a similar opinion, it is difficult to balance the caching period and response realtime ability. And yes, your post about ACK_TIMER is a few years ago,...
Forum:
RDM General Implementation Discussion
September 29th, 2025
Replies:
10
For developing a "not fast" RDM proxy hardware, use ACK_timer or other method?
Views:
14,357
Posted By
yxj-ae86
--RE: Yes, we want to support standard RDM...
--RE: Yes, we want to support standard RDM responder at the end of PLC communication.
--RE: Currently we want support this one.
--RE: this is not our plan.
Forum:
RDM General Implementation Discussion
September 28th, 2025
Replies:
10
For developing a "not fast" RDM proxy hardware, use ACK_timer or other method?
Views:
14,357
Posted By
yxj-ae86
Thanks for you reply. Best user experience,...
Thanks for you reply.
Best user experience, do you mean response time? And if choose ACK_TIMER+QUEUED_MESSAGE, only add about 50-100ms, I think it is acceptable.
Our concern is that whether...
Forum:
RDM General Implementation Discussion
September 27th, 2025
Replies:
10
For developing a "not fast" RDM proxy hardware, use ACK_timer or other method?
Views:
14,357
Posted By
yxj-ae86
For developing a "not fast" RDM proxy hardware, use ACK_timer or other method?
HI, RPMer, I am a RDM rookie.
Right now we are developing a RDM proxy, a power line communication hardware which convert RDM/DMX512 to PLC two-way.
There is one PLC proxy connects to the RDM master...
Showing results 1 to 7 of 7
Forum Jump
User Control Panel
Private Messages
Subscriptions
Who's Online
Search Forums
Forums Home
RDM Developer Forums
RDM General Implementation Discussion
RDM Interpretation Questions
RDM Physical Layer/Hardware Discussion
RDM Timing Discussion
RDMnet (E1.33) General Discussion
E1.31/sACN General Discussion
RDM User Forums
RDM User Discussion
DMX512 Discussion
RDM Marketplace Discussion
All times are GMT -6. The time now is
11:36 AM
.
Contact Us
-
RDM Protocol Forums
-
Archive
-
Top
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.