E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums

E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums (http://www.rdmprotocol.org/forums/index.php)
-   RDM Interpretation Questions (http://www.rdmprotocol.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   Sub device field handling (http://www.rdmprotocol.org/forums/showthread.php?t=1341)

Milton Davis July 29th, 2024 10:55 AM

Sub device field handling
 
I have a responder with no sub devices. If I receive a command from a controller such as GET_DMX_START_ADDRESS, but that command has a non-zero sub device field, I'm thinking I should respond with a NACK sub device out of range response. Is there another way to interpret this?

ericthegeek July 30th, 2024 10:16 AM

That is the correct interpretation in my view.


If a responder has no sub-devices, it should NACK any request that has a non-zero sub-device field. The NACK Reason Code should be NR_SUB_DEVICE_OUT_OF_RANGE

Milton Davis July 30th, 2024 10:39 AM

Thanks Eric. I was just looking through the draft E1.20 document and I see that it clarifies this point and agrees with our interpretation.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:44 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.