E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums  

Go Back   E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums > RDM Developer Forums > RDM Interpretation Questions

RDM Interpretation Questions Discussion and questions relating to interpreting and understanding the E1.20 RDM Standard.

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old June 14th, 2012   #1
Thomas
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2
Default Interpretation of NR_BUFFER_FULL

Hi all,

imagine the following situation:

The message queue of an RDM responder is full. A Set request arrives.
Saving needs too long to be answered with ACK. Therefore the answer is NACK with reason NR_BUFFER_FULL.

What behavior would you expect from the RDM responder?

1. The value is saved but no message written to the queue.
Because: If the RDM controller does not support QUEUED_MESSAGE it is still be able to configure the RDM responder also if the message queue is full. The successful saving can be checked using the corresponding Get request.

2. The value is not changed
Because: The responder reported NACK, which is defined as "the responder is ... unable to process the specified SET command"

3. Any other behavior ???

Best regards
Thomas
Thomas is offline   Reply With Quote
 

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Interpretation of ACK_TIMER eldoMS RDM Interpretation Questions 4 August 21st, 2011 03:39 AM
Welcome to the RDM Interpretation Discussion Forum sblair RDM Interpretation Questions 0 May 31st, 2006 10:47 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.