E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums  

Go Back   E1.20 RDM (Remote Device Management) Protocol Forums > Search Forums

Showing results 1 to 29 of 29
Search took 0.00 seconds.
Search: Posts Made By: mike_k
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion April 25th, 2012
Replies: 11
Views: 13,081
Posted By mike_k
If you PM me the email address you want it to, I...

If you PM me the email address you want it to, I can send you some files...
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion September 2nd, 2011
Replies: 7
Views: 6,750
Posted By mike_k
I totally agree that if the length does not...

I totally agree that if the length does not match, it is something wrong (especially if message length is not consistent with PDL)... But there are just so many things that the responder could cope...
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions September 1st, 2011
Replies: 8
Views: 8,913
Posted By mike_k
Just have in mind that the UID shall be unique....

Just have in mind that the UID shall be unique. So that if you have two of your root devices in the same system, they may not expose one each of your devices as the same UID.
Might sound obvious,...
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion September 1st, 2011
Replies: 7
Views: 6,750
Posted By mike_k
I agree with you, to some degree... Problem...

I agree with you, to some degree...

Problem is, that out in the real world the controller is not the piece of equipment that will get the blame if your responder does not work, the user just knows...
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion March 17th, 2011
Replies: 2
Views: 4,805
Posted By mike_k
One interesting question, is it considered "not...

One interesting question, is it considered "not passing" if the responder is forgiving? For instance, not NACKing a GET:DEVICE_LABEL with a PDL > 0?
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions February 17th, 2011
Replies: 8
Views: 8,166
Posted By mike_k
Scott, yes of course the best would be to get...

Scott, yes of course the best would be to get everybody doing everything right. In the meanwhile unfortunately we'll have to do a lot of work-arounds. Especially for us doing in-line devices that is...
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions February 17th, 2011
Replies: 8
Views: 8,166
Posted By mike_k
Our multi-universe transmitters have multiple...

Our multi-universe transmitters have multiple responder ports, however I've chosen to not use the binding UID because at some point I ran into a controller that did not handle it (not just that it...
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion May 25th, 2010
Replies: 33
Views: 15,871
Posted By mike_k
When saying that I assume that you mean queued...

When saying that I assume that you mean queued messages generated by an event at the responser (changing of DMX address, etc)?
Queued messages in response to to for instance a SET:DMX_START_ADDRESS...
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion May 25th, 2010
Replies: 33
Views: 15,871
Posted By mike_k
You are correct, I remembered incorrectly. I had...

You are correct, I remembered incorrectly. I had some weird thought that the SET_RESPONSE included the value as well. I have to blame the early morning at the time of my post.
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion May 24th, 2010
Replies: 33
Views: 15,871
Posted By mike_k
I think the best way to look at it is "What will...

I think the best way to look at it is "What will make the most sense for the controller?"

In the case with DMX_START_ADDRESS it wont make any difference for the controller, hence you could go with...
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion April 29th, 2010
Replies: 3
Views: 5,095
Posted By mike_k
Unfortunately we have to put the plug fest on...

Unfortunately we have to put the plug fest on hold. The volcano on Iceland have made a mess of many peoples schedules.
Please stay tuned for a new date for this opportunity.
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion March 29th, 2010
Replies: 3
Views: 5,095
Posted By mike_k
European RDM plug fest

LumenRadio AB invites all manufacturers with an interrest in RDM to Gothenburg, Sweden, May 21-23 for an RDM plug fest. The plug fest is free of charge and is open for all engineers having an...
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions March 29th, 2010
Replies: 28
Views: 13,783
Posted By mike_k
Unfortunately the standard have quite some issues...

Unfortunately the standard have quite some issues with stuff being written mainly from a responder implementation point of view where the controller side of things apparently was forgotten. ...
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion March 3rd, 2010
Replies: 33
Views: 15,871
Posted By mike_k
I agree with Scott, I would sent it with the...

I agree with Scott, I would sent it with the current value since the old value is not of very much interest any longer if it has changed since last GET.
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion March 2nd, 2010
Replies: 33
Views: 15,871
Posted By mike_k
How come that everybody assumes that queued...

How come that everybody assumes that queued messages needs to actually be queued, in some of my devices that support queued messages I only queue the message type. Hence it need only a few bits to...
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion January 15th, 2010
Replies: 8
Views: 6,030
Posted By mike_k
I agree with Eric and Scott. As you describe...

I agree with Eric and Scott.

As you describe it, you should set the root device to having a footprint of 48 and the sub-devices to have a footprint of 0.
You don't have to support SLOT_INFO, but...
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion November 11th, 2009
Replies: 12
Views: 13,973
Posted By mike_k
Are you developing your own LEDfixture as well as...

Are you developing your own LEDfixture as well as the controller?

In that case you have good possibilities to achieve what you want.

First of all, RDM is not topology aware. The controller have...
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion November 10th, 2009
Replies: 12
Views: 13,973
Posted By mike_k
If I understand correct you want auto adressing...

If I understand correct you want auto adressing to be done so that the devices with the letters are adressed in the order that they are located physically? For instance the order that the are...
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion November 10th, 2009
Replies: 9
Views: 6,272
Posted By mike_k
Would be interesting to know what controller it...

Would be interesting to know what controller it is... In the current version of our controller we use the GET:QUEUED_MESSAGE even if the device doesn't support it and use the NACK only to keep track...
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions October 16th, 2009
Replies: 13
Views: 9,644
Posted By mike_k
That sounds more like a specific controller bug....

That sounds more like a specific controller bug. A device should be able to have footprints of 0 and still have multiple personalities (any other personalities might have a footprint of >0 but that...
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion October 14th, 2009
Replies: 6
Views: 5,924
Posted By mike_k
If you are planning to have the device "out of...

If you are planning to have the device "out of the box" supported by most controllers I would suggest having 64 personalities.
Having manufacturer specific PIDs often don't blend in very well in...
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions October 14th, 2009
Replies: 13
Views: 9,644
Posted By mike_k
I agree with Eric that if the subdevice is not...

I agree with Eric that if the subdevice is not patchable and does not consume any DMX channels then the SLOT_INFO should be on the root device since then the root device is what is consuming the...
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion October 1st, 2009
Replies: 2
Views: 3,851
Posted By mike_k
Fair enough. I'm comfortable with just adding a...

Fair enough. I'm comfortable with just adding a note pointing the issue out and explaining that the flow chart isn't intended to be complete, but rather give an introduction to the concept.
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion October 1st, 2009
Replies: 5
Views: 4,471
Posted By mike_k
I don't think the standard references to...

I don't think the standard references to additional information at the website as it does with B-2 etc.
In that case the core document would have to be opened t adding the constant, or adding a...
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion October 1st, 2009
Replies: 3
Views: 4,552
Posted By mike_k
I would say that Hertz (1 Hz = 1/s) would be the...

I would say that Hertz (1 Hz = 1/s) would be the appropriate unit to use for this. [Hz] is the most commonly used unit for measuring periodic events even in cases when it is not "pure" cycles. But I...
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion September 30th, 2009
Replies: 2
Views: 3,851
Posted By mike_k
Figure 7-2: Device Discovery Process

Some time ago I noticed that this flowchart may lead to some problems if people use it as an implementation guide...

The flow chart does not handle ghosted UIDs very well.

For instance:
The...
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion September 30th, 2009
Replies: 5
Views: 4,471
Posted By mike_k
I would have use for UNIT_PERCENT as well.

I would have use for UNIT_PERCENT as well.
Forum: RDM Interpretation Questions September 30th, 2009
Replies: 14
Views: 10,653
Posted By mike_k
I've seen quite a few products that replies with...

I've seen quite a few products that replies with the minimum required set of PIDs included in the list, so even if responders are not supposed to do so the controllers should be able to handle all...
Forum: RDM General Implementation Discussion July 25th, 2009
Replies: 1
Views: 5,384
Posted By mike_k
I just want to thank all people attending the...

I just want to thank all people attending the plugfest, I attended for the first time and I think it was great. Especially to see that all people are so helpful to those who had problems, I think...
Showing results 1 to 29 of 29

 
Forum Jump

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.